The upcoming Women’s March on Washington was supposed to unite women but has instead apparently sparked some divisive dialogue.
Scheduled for the day after Donald Trump’s inauguration, the progressive event was intended to bring women together to protest the incoming president and his alleged treatment of women.
— Women’s March (@womensmarch) January 10, 2017
But Jennifer Willis, a 50 year-old wedding minister from South Carolina, cancelled her trip after reading a post on the Facebook page for the march, The New York Times reported.
Willis, who was planning to take her daughters with her to the event, was offended by a post by ShiShi Rose, a 27-year-old blogger from Brooklyn, because it made her feel unwelcome.
“Now is the time for you to be listening more, talking less,” Ms. Rose wrote, according to the Times. “You should be reading our books and understanding the roots of racism and white supremacy. Listening to our speeches. You should be drowning yourselves in our poetry.”
— Kurtis (@KurtisBacks) January 10, 2017
Willis found the tone of the post off-putting.
“How do you know that I’m not reading black poetry?” she told the Times.
“This is a women’s march,” she said “We’re supposed to be allies in equal pay, marriage, adoption. Why is it now about, ‘White women don’t understand black women’?”
@michaelshermer They are dividing women by skin color? What a slap in the face to every person who fought segregation. Racist idiots.
— Deplorable Jessica (@jpizz420) January 10, 2017
— Harvey Power 🇦🇺 (@HVPower90) January 10, 2017
Rose told the Times that she did not intend to discourage people from attending but to point out that they had a lot to learn first.
“I needed them to understand that they don’t just get to join the march and not check their privilege constantly,” she said.
“Can you please tell me what that means?” an exasperated Willis asked.
The Jan. 21 march, with Gloria Steinem and Harry Belafonte as honorary co-chairs, has inspired and alienated those involved.
— Twitter Moments (@TwitterMoments) January 10, 2017
According to the Times:
In some ways, the discord is by design. Even as they are working to ensure a smooth and unified march next week, the national organizers said they made a deliberate decision to highlight the plight of minority and undocumented immigrant women and provoke uncomfortable discussions about race.
Another post on the march’s Facebook page featured a quote from black feminist, Bell Hooks, about forging a stronger sisterhood by “confronting the ways women — through sex, class and race — dominated and exploited other women.”
A woman from New Jersey wrote in response: “I’m starting to feel not very welcome in this endeavor.”
Wake up right! Receive our free morning news blast HERE
Latest posts by Frieda Powers (see all)
- WaPost fact checkers gives Bernie Sanders ‘Three Pinocchios’ for big lie about Gorsuch filibuster - March 29, 2017
- Krauthammer has an awesome suggestion if Dems filibuster Gorsuch … and it involves Clint Eastwood - March 29, 2017
- ‘Is Trump Making You Fat?’ Libs entertain the masses with advice on losing ‘POTUS pounds’ - March 29, 2017