California gun law will let police confiscate legally-owned weapons

DC NEWSBy Blake Neff

A new California law scheduled to take effect Friday will allow the police to seize private, legally-owned weapons for up to three weeks without charges or allowing the citizen to contest the seizure.

AB1014 was passed last year in the wake of 2014’s Isla Vista shooting, where teenager Elliot Rodger went on a rampage near the campus of the University of California, Santa Barbara, killing six people along with himself.

Rodger’s parents had reported him to the police prior to the shooting, concerned about his mental health and rants he posted online. But after meeting with Rodger, police decided he wasn’t a criminal risk, and consequently didn’t search his apartment, where he was stockpiling weapons and ammunition.

The new law is intended to stop such a situation from re-occurring. Under the law, a judge has the power to grant a restraining order telling police to seize a person’s guns, based solely on accounts from family members or police that the person is poses an imminent danger to others. The restraining order can be granted without the affected person knowing it exists or being allowed time to contest it.

Under the law, the factors a judge can consider in granting the restraining order include not only threats of violence, but also prior felony arrests (even without a conviction), evidence of alcohol abuse, and even the simple act of recently purchasing a gun or ammunition.

Once granted, police can use the restraining order to confiscate all of a person’s guns and ammunition, and the person is also barred from buying or possessing guns and ammo for the duration of the order. A full court hearing must then be heard within three weeks. At that hearing, a judge will be able to extend the restraining order for an entire year.
“The law gives us a vehicle to cause the person to surrender their weapons, to have a time out, if you will,” Los Angeles Police Department Assistant Chief Michael Moore told Southern California Public Radio. “It allows further examination of the person’s mental state.”

The law expands on California gun laws that are already some of the country’s toughest. Police already have the power to seize a person’s guns if a licensed therapist informs them that the person’s mental state makes them a danger to themselves or others.

Unsurprisingly, pro-gun organizations such as the National Rifle Association (NRA) have strongly opposed the law since it was first proposed. The NRA Institute for Legislative Action, the group’s lobbying arm, has already signaled its willingness to use the courts to battle the law. Noting that the law makes it a misdemeanor to file a frivolous request for one of the new restraining orders, the group has encouraged anybody who feels unjustly targeted to contact their attorneys.

Follow Blake on Twitter

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].

Comments

6 thoughts on “California gun law will let police confiscate legally-owned weapons

  1. Fastercat says:

    Seems like a good idea on the surface, but I predict rampant abuse in The peoples Republik of Kalipornia.

  2. johnnygeneric says:

    So, your estranged wife decides to get even with you and says you were mean and she’s afraid you might shoot her, so she gets the judicial system to take away his fire arm.

  3. Kenneth Clark says:

    Pelosi and gang must be proud. So I must assume that the threat to the safety of the people of California that she and the other Progressive Liberals pose deems them and all of their personal security details as top candidates for this new law and ALL of their weapons will be confiscated in a few days.

  4. tsigili says:

    Liberals are going to take all the rights of the people, if we don’t act to stop them. The entire Democratic Party is subversive to our country.

  5. Krrrruptidsoless says:

    I don’t think frivolous and constitutional are equal words.
    Sounds like if a person doesn’t like somebody they will be considered for an enactment of California popularity control against them.
    First rule of order so that they can belittle them almost like a person stripping someone of credit by identification theft will be their weapons. Just so the wanton popular people can continue to have their way at others expense.

  6. Mary Brown says:

    Kalifornistan! Guilty until proven innocent! Massive violation of the right to due process and I see this one going to the supreme court.

    And CA cops have a bad habit of destroying peoples guns instead of giving them back! This is gun confiscation!

Comments are closed.

Related Posts