Cruz control: ‘How about a debate moderated by Hannity, Levin, and Rush Limbaugh?’

cruz-ted-featDescribing the media as the Democrat Party’s cheerleaders, Senator Ted Cruz tore into the moderators for Wednesday’s CNBC Republican presidential debate in a post-debate interview with Fox News’ Sean Hannity.

“The moderators and the networks don’t want anyone to vote for any of the men or women on stage,” Cruz told Hannity.

Hannity agreed, calling Cruz’s criticism of the moderators during the debate the best line of the night.

“In many instances tonight, [the moderators were] a disgrace to the ‘profession’ of journalism,” Hannity argued.

“Why is it, we keep having debates where the moderators – no one in their right mind thinks the moderators will actually vote in a Republican primary?” Cruz asked rhetorically, repeating the criticism he made during the debate.

“Republican primary debates ought to be moderated by people who would actually vote in a primary. How about a debate moderated by Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, and Rush Limbaugh?”

Cruz probably shouldn’t hold his breath for such a “dream team” of moderators, but his point was well received by Hannity, who seemed entertained by the idea.

In the end, the reason for the moderator’s biased questions and petty attacks was pretty obvious, even to Cruz.

“They want people to either stay home, or vote for Hillary,” he argued.

Michael Schaus

Michael Schaus

Michael Schaus is a talk radio host, political humorist, and columnist. Having worked in a wide range of industries (including construction, journalism, and financial services) his perspectives and world views are forged with a deep understanding of what it means to be an American entrepreneur.
Michael Schaus

Comments

8 thoughts on “Cruz control: ‘How about a debate moderated by Hannity, Levin, and Rush Limbaugh?’

  1. Grover Syck says:

    A debate moderated by

    Hannity, Levin, and Rush Limbaugh.

    Talk about soft balls and screw balls.

    It would be an even bigger joke that the previous debates.

    1. SusieQ says:

      Wouldn’t it be nice to see how that would work instead of assuming. We know what has happened with the bunch conducting the “inquisition” in the “berates” now don’t we?

      We know will never ever happen though as all the networks are run by leftist elitist.

    2. Mary Brown says:

      So questions from CONSERVATIVES are softballs and screwball. Attacks from liberal nutcases are fine.

      You are the problem in this country!

    3. Rip Rogers says:

      The yoke is on you.

    4. Carol Amin says:

      ‎‎

      .…my friend’s half-sister $97 working on a PC onIine……..A few days ago new McLaren F1 subsequent after earning 18,512$,,,this was my previous month’s paycheck ,and-a little over, $17k Last month ..3-5 h/r of work a day ..with extra open doors & weekly paychecks.. it’s realy the easiest work I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months ago and now making over $83, p/h..Learn More right Here….
      1uej…….
      ➤➤
      ➤➤➤ http://GlobalEmploymentReportsTopStarJobsPop/Get/$97hourly… ❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦

  2. RayOne says:

    The MSM objective is to discourage workers and voters who don’t support hClinton.

  3. tsigili says:

    The point being………there are NO objective media persons………in ANY of the media, whatsoever.

  4. kazzer66 says:

    Better yet, how about a Democrat’s debate moderated by Hannity, Levin and Limbaugh?

Comments are closed.

Related Posts