Justice Thomas’ dissent: ‘The government cannot bestow dignity, and it cannot take it away’

304-thomas_full_600

Justice Clarence Thomas has a huge “dignity” problem with Friday’s Supreme Court decision making same-sex marriage legal in all 50 states, while one newspaper has a bigger problem with dissenting views.

In his dissent, Thomas invoked America’s past with slavery to illustrate his chagrin at the Court’s majority opinion, written by Justice Anthony Kennedy.

The corollary of that principle is that human dignity cannot be taken away by the government. Slaves did not lose their dignity (any more than they lost their humanity) because the government allowed them to be enslaved. Those held in internment camps did not lose their dignity because the government confined them. And those denied governmental benefits certainly do not lose their dignity because the government denies them those benefits. The government cannot bestow dignity, and it cannot take it away.

Thomas further accused the majority opinion of casting truth aside, disregarding the meaning of “liberty,” and distorting “the principles on which this Nation was founded.”

His dissent concluded with a warning: “[The Court’s] decision will have inestimable consequences for our Constitution and our society.”

Steve Berman

Steve Berman

Steve is a serial entrepreneur who has been starting and running businesses for 25 years. Writing about conservative causes is his passion.
Steve Berman

Comments

22 thoughts on “Justice Thomas’ dissent: ‘The government cannot bestow dignity, and it cannot take it away’

  1. Harry Crook says:

    He has cast the warning. Our future is bleak at best. The white house has become a blinking advertisement for the less than 1% in this country. No more dignity there. That was actually lost almost 8 years ago.

Comments are closed.

Related Posts