Christian activists tick off atheists; cover Chicago’s anti-Christmas display with giant banner

Conservative Christians squared off in a pre-Christmas contest of ideas with an atheist group after the Christians unfurled a banner heralding the existence of angels to cover up an atheist group’s neon “A” in Chicago’s Daly Plaza.

As part of its annual – and annually more tiresome — efforts to make a grab headlines and generally make a nuisance of itself under the guise of intellectual freedom, the Freedom From Religion Foundation lit up a giant cursive letter “A” in the heart of Chicago.

aisforangels1226The Christian group Remember America Foundation has another idea, and placed  a banner in front of the atheists’ “A,” declaring “A is for angels”

A confrontation ensued, of course, which is exactly what the Freedom From Religion posers were pushing for. (Check out the video below.)

Every year, an atheist group does this, and every year they’re about as clever as your basic high-school sophomore who thinks he’s the first person to realize there are actually two creation stories in Genesis, that the Gospels are not in complete agreement with each other on every detail, that God doesn’t seem entirely fair to everyone all the time in the Bible.

In the Chicago case, the atheists were trying to upstage a Nativity scene at the annual German-American Christkindlmarket holiday market – you don’t have to speak German to figure out there’s something vaguely religious about it.

Too much religion for the Freedom From Religion folks, who’ve now staged their foot-stamping crying tantrums around the country again, in Florida’s Capitol, in Madison, Wis., Chicago and elsewhere..

Remember this next Ramadan, when the atheists again fail to treat the religion of Islam with the same mocking denigration they use so bravely against Christianity in this country.

They’re juvenile.

But they’re not suicidal.

H/T: Mediaite

 

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the RSS feed

Joe Saunders

Joe Saunders, a 25-year newspaper veteran, is a staff writer and editor for BizPac Review who lives in Tallahassee and covers capital and Florida politics. Email Joe at jpjsaunders@gmail.com.
About Joe Saunders

Joe Saunders, a 25-year newspaper veteran, is a staff writer and editor for BizPac Review who lives in Tallahassee and covers capital and Florida politics. Email Joe at jpjsaunders@gmail.com.

  • butterflyinoh

    Here’s another group, the Atheisists; another minority that wants to squash our Freedom of Religion…too bad….one day we’ll all have to stand in Gods’ judgement, whether you believe or not.

    • Brian Westley

      The only people squashing freedom here are the Christians, trying to stop the atheists’ freedom of speech by covering up their banner.

      butterflyinoh, how, specifically, are atheists trying to squash your freedom of religion? Examples, please.

      • Alice

        Threatening schools If the children sing Christmas carols, threatening to sue if any business stands on Christian principles. Most of the people threatened cannot afford lawyers so the practice is effective; but, when those lawyers and atheists try making their case before Almighty God, the advocate will not represent them (he will not know them) and they will be left with no recourse.

        • lovinspoonful

          Brian, when you come before the final judge, you will find out what Christians have been telling you all along.

          • Brian Westley

            And when you find out that the Jews were right and you were violating one of the Noachide laws that non-Jews were required to follow by worshipping a mere human as a god, what will you do?

          • lovinspoonful

            Prove that Jesus (God) was a mere human. Prove there is no such person as Jesus (God).

          • Brian Westley

            I was showing you how unconvincing your first reply to me is.

            If the Jews are right, you are violating one of god’s laws. But since you don’t believe the Jews are right, it doesn’t matter to you.

            Same with me regarding your god.

          • chamuiel

            correct, we do not believe you are right.

          • Well Done

            Tell us now about the Moslems. Go after them, queerbait. Go ahead.

          • Brian Westley
          • Debora Ann Binegar Howk

            Your all morons!

          • heroay

            Wow! Another Vinegar troll from tel aviv? Get a JOB, get a LIFE, stop being a dumb pariah. And LEARN English, moronia! LOL!!

          • Debora Ann Binegar Howk

            I am white own my own business. I live on the coast the one you only vacation at if your welfare isn’t late. You are stupid!!!!!

          • heroay

            own business and ‘working’ for the gubbie? Not surprised! There are much too many like you around. In standing armies, forbidden by the Constitution. That’s how the Zionist Occupation Government controls a majority vote to retain its power over the tax robbed working population. Shame!

          • Debora Ann Binegar Howk

            We also have 2 that’s 2 BA’s each. And work for the government.

          • heroay

            LOL!! BA’s?? i could laugh at my PhD ‘pofessas’ clumsiness in school, and you brag about BA? Typical aggrandized morons, can’t even WRITE English correctly… And ‘work’ for the Gov MEANS, like the Gov, parasitize on OUR tax robbed money. Such dignified vacationers around the country… with OUR money. BTW, WHAT does the Gov PRODUCE, that is edible, repairable, resellable, can be traded for other goods, or in any form help sustain other people, that does not EXPLODE and KILL? ZERO. Sick.

          • Debora Ann Binegar Howk

            My son is a USM my whole family is military. Come say it in person I live in NC by the base.

          • heroay

            USM, meaning…. US Marine, is that it?… Well, hate to disappoint you, but YOU have to read a real honorable military, USMC Major General Smedley Butler’s 2-book “War is a Racket”. And you all belong into the military?? “Working” for the zionist war financiers (at the expense of tax robbed citizens), to invade and rapine for their profits. Ask Bush and Cheney. Such pride. As for your challenge, typical of government encrusted serfs. Pathetic.

          • Debora Ann Binegar Howk

            You sound like a middle eastern baby raper

          • heroay

            Keep posting, vinegar reptard trollie. The more you drool online, the more you show your credentials. Either you flunked elementary school, or your tel aviv English instructors were as dumb as you.

          • Debora Ann Binegar Howk

            Your a small minded little man
            You must have a small one. LMFAO!!!!
            You googled wrong lol

          • heroay

            Dumbtard, you can’t even write English?? Are you falling off your stool, or being flushed away in the toilet?? Did the nurse gave you permission to use her computer? Absolute idiot!

          • heterodox

            Queerbait? And they call atheists juvenile!

          • reggiec

            Atheism is a product of a false belief in intellectual superiority. It usually begins at about age 16 when kids first begin to question authority. The ultimate authority they question is faith in religion. Atheists that remain as atheists as they mature are stuck in their state of arrested development. What is your age Brian?

          • Brian Westley

            “Atheism is a product of a false belief in intellectual superiority. ”

            No, it’s the absence of belief in invisible superbeings. I don’t see any good reason to think gods exist.

          • sunny733

            The wind is invisible, isn’t it? You may see the trees move, but how do you know it’s the wind?
            You have a very sad life…believe what you want, it’s your life, but I have friends that are atheist, and they continually ask about my faith, and one said he was, well, could not understand my complete faith, yet, I could tell he wanted something….he was dying of cancer.
            I really don’t care if you believe or not….but I do KNOW you are a troll.
            Have fun, troll…I’m going outside and enjoying the day. Stay attached to the pc and argue with people who know better.
            peace
            p.s. learn to research…instead of just being a pain in the ass. lol

          • Brian Westley

            “The wind is invisible, isn’t it?”

            So is pholgiston. The difference is that wind can be detected, while pholgiston was searched for but not found, and abandoned. Same with gods.

            “I really don’t care if you believe or not”

            Then why do you keep replying?

          • tionico

            a better question is why do YOU persist in convincing others God does not exist.. if He truly does not? If we’re wring and you right, it matters nothing, as that’s where all this will end up. If we are right and you wrong, you will eventually learn the truth. YOur problem.

          • Brian Westley

            “a better question is why do YOU persist in convincing others God does not exist.”

            I haven’t been doing that.

          • heterodox

            Actually it does matter. If you’re wrong, then you’re wasting your time and that of many others, not to mention a vast amount of energy and other resources–all on a fantasy.

          • Joe Swartz

            Then, do you say that people have not detected God? Why would you have such a false and untested assumption?

          • Brian Westley

            “Then, do you say that people have not detected God?”

            I very much doubt people have detected gods.

            “Why would you have such a false and untested assumption?”

            Because people have supposedly detected thousands of mutually contradictory gods on the shoddiest of evidence for thousands of years. Gods were said to be responsible for natural phenomena like lightning and earthquakes.

            They can’t all be right, but they can all be wrong, and I see no reason to believe any of them really exist.

          • heroay

            What a dumb idiot! Here dumbo, check yourself…am not your nanny. Just Google… Savvy Google, tard??

            “Does God Exist?” -video
            “Is God a Mathematician?”
            “Life’s Ultimate Question – Does
            God Exist?”
            “The Fine Tunning of the Universe”

            Actually, you are just a retard programmable zionist talmudic troll, but other sincere and intelligent people (and Christians) will find these compelling, NOT from the religious point of view, but from the SCIENTIFIC perspective. Denial is futile.

          • Debora Ann Binegar Howk

            LMAO, now I know what’s wrong with you.
            Your one of those bible thumpers.
            god is a fairy tail!!

          • heroay

            Hey, vinegar cracked nut, fairies do NOT have TAILS, dumb English flunktard troll! LOL!! DUMB!! As for the references, dumbtard, those are SCIENTIFIC investigations, not Bible lectures, but you are too darn ignorant to even write simple English, much less understand scientific postulations. D-u-m-b troll!

          • Debora Ann Binegar Howk

            Want some tissues

          • heroay

            Am fine, you are the one who has spilled the pudding all over the floor, dumbtard.

          • Debora Ann Binegar Howk

            You take medication don’t you! Your one of them nut jobs aren’t you
            Your making me LMFAO

          • heroay

            Oh-my-GOG! Not only you are a real dumbtard, but you even flaunt it! How stupid! Go back to your latrine in the M.E. and tell your boss to teach you more English, you are absolutely stupid!

          • Debora Ann Binegar Howk

            You hate yourself don’t you

          • heroay

            You are really stupid, aren’t you? Flush yourself on the way out.

          • Debora Ann Binegar Howk

            You need friend’s you have commented on every post. Your like one of them nuts and goes shots people. I think you need watched.

          • heroay

            HAHAHA!! You ARE the DUMBEST troll EVER!!! Stupid punk, the JWO must be cracking around, to send such imbecile retard like into the treads!! LOOOOL!! Vinegar crackpot retard!!!

          • Debora Ann Binegar Howk

            Your real educated aren’t you
            Do you read what you write crackpot. LMFAO!! HAHAHAHA!!! LOL!!!

          • heroay

            Stupid baboon, you really escaped the asylum, didn’t you? And of course you LYFAO, you have your mouth right in IT, idiot! HAHAHAHA!

          • heroay

            Hurry up, punk, am WAITING!! Dumbtard

          • heroay

            Hurry up stupid retard!!

          • Debora Ann Binegar Howk

            You looking up what to write or you copy and paste.

          • heroay

            HAHAHAHA!! Listen to this truly punk retard latrine dweller!! Can’t even write like an elementary school child! Idiot, you are ridiculous, a disgrace to the JWO, LOOOL!!

          • heroay

            HAHAHAHA!! Listen to this truly punk retard latrine dweller!! Can’t even
            write like an elementary school child! Idiot, you are ridiculous, a
            disgrace to the JWO

          • Karen Lee King

            The fool hath said in his heart, “there is no God.” Psalm14:1a Just wait until judgment day and then we’ll see who is wrong and who is right.

          • heroay

            because he is a log, in the evolutionary sense of the word. Can’t feel but itself, roots in the ground.

          • Debora Ann Binegar Howk

            Lol!!!!!

          • heroay

            “lol”??? Dumbtard, when did you escape the asylum?? Unique! Never seen a dumbtard like you!

          • Debora Ann Binegar Howk

            Your parents hate you don’t they

          • heroay

            HAHAHA! Stop posting from your manual, dumbtard, you are as silly duimb as you are stupid!

          • Debora Ann Binegar Howk

            You have nothing or no one don’t you

          • heroay

            LOL!!! You ARE a REAL DUMBTARD! Learn English, stupid troll! LOL!!

          • heterodox

            Are those serious statements?

            If you feel and hear the wind, then see a tree move, how do you know it moved because of the wind? Is this a serious question?

            Do you understand that wind and its effects can be (and is) studied and measured?

            I cannot believe you are serious.

          • sunny733

            You bore me.
            Later.

          • Yvonne Snider Richards

            I challenge you, dear Brian, that if you excepted Jesus into your heart…you would wonder how you could have been so naive as not to except Him before…and you will ask for forgiveness and you will be hard pressed to forgive yourself….

          • Brian Westley

            I have “excepted” Jesus.

            The word you seem to be looking for is “accepted”.

          • Joe Swartz

            Did you accept Him for who He said He was and for what He said He did for you? You are arguing spirituality and the flesh knows nothing of it.

          • Billy Bumtrip

            You got her on that one.

          • heroay

            Bum Trip. Certainly.

          • heroay

            leave grammar alone, you DID understand. Now, REPLY. Dummy.

          • tionico

            if that were a valid representation of atheism, then those trying to prove that which does not exist does not exist are wasting everyone’s time. Can you prove I was NOT in Hoboken New Jersey yesterday? Can you PROVE I do not own a fountain pen? Can you PROVE the God in which I believe does not exist when all round about you is abundant proof that some such Being exists, else how could all THIS exist? If there truly were no transcendent and infinite God, then you could quietly go your way, knowing any attention to such a “myth” would be attention to naught…. why, even Santa Claus is more real than your lack of a god of any sort. Why rail against that which exists not? You are busy punching shadows and air, if you are correct. So what if the rest of the world is deluded? The reason youb are offended by the concept is that, deep down inside, you KNOW He does indeed exist… but refuse to acknowledge it, as that acknowledgement would necessitate a response on your part…. and your pride will not allow that. Fine……

          • Joe Swartz

            There doesn’t have to be a good reason. That it IS good, you are lucky.

          • Brian Westley

            You can certainly believe in anything you like without having a good reason for your beliefs. I prefer skepticism.

          • heroay

            and you have a good reason for skepticism?? If you cannot REASON, how you figured it?

          • Billy Bumtrip

            You walk through life blind. When you grow up I believe your eyes may open.

          • heroay

            he is blind. He painted ‘eyes’ on his bottom bottle glasses.

          • Karen Lee King

            How many of you use the phrase, “Oh my God!”? You gotta believe in God some to be calling on him when you get into trouble or something.

          • heroay

            They do, these pseudo-atheists: Their god is Molech, Ball, Satan (after the Babylonian exile). Ah yes, and Gold and Money. Pity.

          • heterodox

            You’re right. But even if one were to believe in some type of god, belief in any of the established major religions would not logically follow. I can understand why someone would feel that some type of super-being must exist. But there is simply no reason to believe the crap written in some ancient text (or a phony ancient text, i.e. that of Mormonism).

          • Namyriah

            You are gay, so naturally you are biased against Christians. You embraced atheism not for intellectual reasons but because of moral ones.

          • heterodox

            You’re right, except that you have it reversed. Fear of authority (especially nonexistent authority, i.e. “god”) that continues into adulthood is a prime example of arrested development.

            I love how frustrated you religious types get with us. I love how you always revert to vapid, meaningless non-arguments and mischaracterizations. You simply cannot get your thoughts straight.

          • Joe Swartz

            We are not under the Jewish Law. We should, could, and need to obey it but we are not under it.

          • Brian Westley

            WHOOSH is the sound of the point going way over your head.

          • heroay

            No, dummy retard, that’s your back door blowing out your hot air.

          • heroay

            NOT in these United States! The Founders despised ‘judaism’ and even wanted an Article to forbid it in the US.

          • heroay

            the punk is a robot for zion. He cannot prove even himself.

          • heterodox

            Wow, did you miss the point.

            You can’t prove either belief system one way or the other, so you really have no idea which is right. Threatening atheists with the horrors of your Christian ideology is exactly equivalent to you being threatened with the same of other belief systems–and there are many.

          • lovinspoonful

            No, you missed the point. And you know nothing about atheism or Christianity.

          • sunny733

            And how, pray tell, are the Jews right? I respect that they don’t believe that Jesus is the Messiah, but I would hope they respect that I do. As I would hope you would, too.
            Actually, I think both these groups are acting like children. There is room on this planet for all of us.
            peace

          • heroay

            Read history. As long as ONE of these parasites can infect a single town, the whole country will eventually perish. They are the PLAGUE!

          • Well Done

            Brian, I’m sure you don’t realize how stupid an atheist looks when quoting one religious doctrine in order to oppose another. None of you atheists do. Each time one of you dirt chutes quote scripture of any sort, you totally demolish your own views. Too fun.

          • heroay

            Brainwashed into the talmudic dung since first able to read gibberish, impossible to repair such brain damage for the rest of their parasitic useless life.

          • mperkins2

            No laws have been violated by worshiping Jesus because He was God in a human body. You should learn more about the Word of God yourself and stop listening to what others say on the subject. You would be a lot better off.

          • Brian Westley

            “No laws have been violated by worshiping Jesus because He was God in a human body.”

            Jewish law is violated. Of course, religious laws have no power in the US.

          • mperkins2

            How can Jewish law be broken if you are worshiping God?

          • Brian Westley

            According to the Jews, Jesus is not a god, and worshipping someone who is not a god AS god is a violation of Jewish law.

          • mperkins2

            Not to all Jews. There are many saved Jews who have come to realize that Jesus is the Christ. Whether any others believe it or not does not change the fact that He is the one prophesized in the Old Testament who would be the King of the Jews.

          • Brian Westley

            “There are many saved Jews who have come to realize that Jesus is the Christ.”

            Those would be “Christians”.

          • heroay

            Close your mouth. Dung is on its way.

          • mperkins2

            So they get saved and accept Christ they are no longer Jewish? Your comprehension skills are much worse than I thought.

          • Brian Westley

            Jews don’t consider them Jewish anymore, no. Check Maimonides.

          • debalazo

            Mamon-ides! Such deranged vicious Talmudic bigot, your ‘guide’ in life? Might as well drop dead now, and save further degeneracy.

          • Brian Westley

            “Such deranged vicious Talmudic bigot, your ‘guide’ in life?”

            Of course not; I’m an atheist. I only cited Maimonides on the fact that Jews don’t consider Jewish converts to Christianity to be Jews any more.

          • debalazo

            Hypocrite lying leech. Why would a satanist only quote the devil or its ‘followers’? Or ashkenazi ‘socialists’, Lenin? Or you the talmud and its bigoted, racist, demented rabbis? Because you are one sick of them.

          • mperkins2

            I never knew a change in heart could change your race. It does not matter what you say other Jews think They will always be Jewish just like Jesus. I’m sorry you do not have the ability to understand this.

          • Brian Westley

            Judaism isn’t a race, and Christians do not get to decide who is Jewish.

          • mperkins2

            Jews/Israelites are the same thing or you could call them Hebrews it is all the same. The Jews are a people and I or no Christian named them that it was God who named them. Please read your Bible and know what you are talking about before we converse any further.

          • Brian Westley

            Look, Jews don’t consider converts to Christianity to be Jews any more. You can also convert to Judaism and become a Jew, and you can’t do that with race.

            Your bible is irrelevant to how Jews decide who’s Jewish, and I wouldn’t mind one bit if we never conversed again.

          • mperkins2

            It is you who is irrelevant.

          • heroay

            ‘judaism’ is a TAG, an invention of the 13th c. AD. It had to wait for the letter ‘J’ get also invented (I with a satanic tail), in the 12th c AD. To DECEIVE.

          • Mr Keith Charles Johnson

            They refer to themselves as Messianic Jews.

          • heroay

            YUK! They can keep to themselves. Marranos, Conversos, and ilk, generally proved to be deceiving moles. Today, called Sayanim, by tel aviv..

          • heroay

            Shove YOUR ‘law’ where it best fits, moron. Then vow before your Molech, Baal, and Satan (picked up in Babylonia)

          • heroay

            That’s all his pre-programmed fractal brian brain can conceive.

          • heroay

            Shove it. Zio-retard. This is Christian country, not a MD latrine.

          • Mr Keith Charles Johnson

            Show me Brian, and learn how to spell. Noahide Laws has no “c”. If you were trying to sound smart by referencing the Noahide Laws you blew it. Exactly which “mere human” are you referring to? Which Noahide Law says to follow a human as a god?

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noahide_Laws

            Seven Laws of Noah
            From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
            (Redirected from Noahide Laws)

            The rainbow is the unofficial symbol of the Noahide Movement, recalling the rainbow that appeared after the Great Flood of the Bible.

            In Judaism, the Seven Laws of Noah (Hebrew: שבע מצוות בני נח‎ Sheva mitzvot B’nei Noach), or the Noahide Laws, are a set of moral imperatives that, according to the Talmud, were given by God[1] as a binding set of laws for the “children of Noah” – that is, all of humanity.[2][3]

            According to Judaism, any non-Jew who adheres to these laws is regarded as a righteous gentile, and is assured of a place in the World to Come (Hebrew: עולם הבא‎ Olam Haba), the final reward of the righteous.[4][5]

            The seven laws listed by the Tosefta dated to 220 CE and the Babylonian Talmud dated to 300 CE are:[6]

            The prohibition of Idolatry.

            The prohibition of Murder.

            The prohibition of Theft.

            The prohibition of Sexual immorality.

            The prohibition of Blasphemy.

            The prohibition of eating flesh taken from an animal while it is still alive.

            The requirement of maintaining courts to provide legal recourse.

            The Noahide laws comprise the six commandments which were given to Adam in the Garden of Eden, according to the Talmud’s interpretation of Gen 2:16,[7] and a seventh precept, which was added after the Flood of Noah. According to Judaism, the 613 commandments given in the written Torah, as well as their explanations and applications discussed in the oral Torah, are applicable to the Jews only, and non-Jews are bound only to observe the seven Noahide laws.

          • Brian Westley

            “Show me Brian, and learn how to spell. Noahide Laws has no “c”.”

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Laws_of_Noah

            According to Judaism, as expressed in the Talmud, the Noachide Laws apply to all humanity through humankind’s descent from one paternal ancestor, the head of the only family to survive The Flood, who in Hebrew tradition is called Noah.

            http://www.noachide.org.uk

            “If you were trying to sound smart by referencing the Noahide Laws you blew it.”

            If you were trying to sound smart by claiming I didn’t spell “noachide” correctly, you blew it.

          • heroay

            We are Christians, dummy tard homo, you can use your NO-Ah-hide Lows where it better suits your lesser human necessities.

          • Mr Keith Charles Johnson

            Mr. Brian Westley: Are you going to argue with Wikipedia??http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noahide_laws You may be partially right, but I am not completely wrong. http://www.betemunah.org/noachide.html

            It all depends on your reference. Noach is the Hebrew spelling of Noah.

            In Judaism, the Seven Laws of Noah (Hebrew: שבע מצוות בני נח‎ Sheva mitzvot B’nei Noach), or the Noahide Laws, are a set of moral imperatives that, according to the Talmud, were given by God[1] as a binding set of laws for the “children of Noah” – that is, all of humanity.[2][3]

            According to Judaism, any non-Jew who adheres to these laws is regarded as a righteous gentile, and is assured of a place in the World to Come (Hebrew: עולם הבא‎ Olam Haba), the final reward of the righteous.[4][5]

            The seven laws listed by the Tosefta dated to 220 CE and the Babylonian Talmud dated to 300 CE are:[6]

            The prohibition of Idolatry.

            The prohibition of Murder.

            The prohibition of Theft.

            The prohibition of Sexual immorality.

            The prohibition of Blasphemy.

            The prohibition of eating flesh taken from an animal while it is still alive.

            The requirement of maintaining courts to provide legal recourse.

            The Noahide laws comprise the six commandments which were given to Adam in the Garden of Eden, according to the Talmud’s interpretation of Gen 2:16,[7] and a seventh precept, which was added after the Flood of Noah. According to Judaism, the 613 commandments given in the written Torah, as well as their explanations and applications discussed in the oral Torah, are applicable to the Jews only, and non-Jews are bound only to observe the seven Noahide laws.
            ==============================

            Non-Jews need only live under the Seven(7) Noahide Laws, they are not subject to the other 613 commandments of Judaism. Additionally Christians are subject to the New Covenant of Jesus Christ as detailed in the New Testament, as well as the Ten Commandments.
            Plus, you still need to brush up on scripture both Jewish and Non-Jewish..

          • heroay

            America is a Christian, N.T. country, NOT talmudic or otherwise. MUCH LESS, will allow those talmudics in shameless and deranged way, pretend to dismantle not only Christianity, but the Constitution itself. Buzz off, flush them OUT.

            The 10 Commands were for the disobedient, irreverent, materialistic, perverse, Yacobites and Yehudim, NOT for Christians, which didn’t exist then.

            Christians ONLY need the Christic teachings to avoid HELL.

            Attaching by DECEIT the OT to the NT to control and later dismantle Christianity from within, FAILED. X-Posed in their treachery, the final pogrom in History may not be to far away. The 243rd, by their own count. So Be IT!

          • Mr Keith Charles Johnson

            America is a Judeo-Christian country, and the founders based the republics establishment on the entire Holy Bible, not just the New Testament. Please go read a history book.

            http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1320483/posts

          • heroay

            Letter “J” invented in 12th c. AD. “jew” is a TAG from the 13th c. AD. Therefore, “jew-daism” is also a TAG, an oxymoron.

            “jew-daism” today is ‘Talmudism’, the old Mishna, and says Mother Mary was a prostitute, and the Christ is drowning in excrement. And the Founders just ‘loved’ those odious ‘jews’, ja??

            Therefore, “jewdeo-Christianity”, a tag from end of 1800′s and effected in the 1940′s, is another oxymoron. The Talmud proves it.

            The Founders did NOT establish the Republic as a biblical religious state, like the Vatican. They did say GOD gave Man the GIFT of Freedom; then they just wrote it on parchment.

            The grossest misconception that “the Law” is (?) the Ten Commands FOR the rascal disobedient Yacobites, is debatable. The Christ was a NAZARENE, NOT a Pharisee, Sadducee, or Edomite. And the Nazarene were the today known ESSENE in Qumran.

            Matthew 5:17 “…I have not come to destroy the law.” – The Christ.

            …But right after he goes on to “fulfill” (upturn) everything. 5:19-48; 6:1-34; 7:1-27… Just about 90 precepts in the Old, CHANGED for better in the New. And “hypocrites” and “Pharisees” are made twins.

            The 16th c. AD KJV, with its improper ‘annotations’ for people who had NEVER read the Texts, was deceiving if not conspiratorial. People were COACHED into a belief system prevalent today, with eventually 250 ‘versions’ of the ‘bible’ (babble), printed by, yes, these same ‘jew’ ashkenazis, who bought all the editorial houses around 1950, to control and deceive the religious masses with THEIR ‘versions’.

            “FATHER IN HEAVEN”. Why ‘jew-daics’ insist ‘father’ and ‘yahweh’ are synonymous?? “My father”, “the father who is in heaven” (no capital letters then), “the father and I”… Obvious, the Christ was NOT a “jew” (“Ioudean”, at the times; the leftovers AFTER the previous exiles, 722 and 583 BC), and was NOT referring to the un-named ‘yahweh’.

            All your sources and opinions are moot.

          • Mr Keith Charles Johnson

            You have the liberal mantra down pat; i.e., “My Mind’s Made Up, Don’t Confuse Me With The Facts”. Why do you hate Jews so much that you make up words to support your “argument”? You are a true eristic troll, because if you’re not using ‘his-to-ree’ books, where do you come up with your data. You certainly weren’t there. So your claptrap, hackneyed rhetoric simply becomes “His Story”, and the His is You. Please Click On This Link, You’ll Be Amazed.
            http://youtu.be/fzta3A27dn8

            “To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead”. Thomas Paine

          • heroay

            Sequentially, to keep track: NOT ‘liberal’, Libertarian. Truth IS, and makes NO compromise. Else, it is a LIE.

            ‘Hate’ is a carcinogen. ‘Spite’ is revealing, and healthy. And Truthful.

            Since 2000 years ago, Edumeans (Pharisees) and lately their cousin ashkenazis (‘jews’) have been subverting Christianity and Freedom for goy-cows. You KNOW the score. You read your Talmud and Protocols.

            Am using YOUR ashkenazi hand-wired ‘Jehovah Witness Bible’, KNOWN History, edited History, Archeology, and the extant RECORD in STONE, PARCHMENT, and PAPER. And if available to ME, it’s also to YOU.

            HOWEVER, “…because seeing they see NOT, and hearing they hear NOT; NEITHER do they understand.” – Matthew 13:13. Douay-Rheims. And YOU fit in perfect.

            “You were not there”. Neither you. Squared.

            “Claptrap”… Do not break the mirror by speaking too loud.

            JewTube YOUR ‘religious’ souce? Absurd.

            “He who relies on REASON and LOGIC alone, runs the risk of falling into a Forest of Errors.” – T.M.O.

            Or, “If a blind man [Pharisee] leads a blind man [you], both of them will fall into a [deep] hole.” – logion 34 – gospel according to Thomas.

            And yes, even to THOMAS the twin, dydumos iudas tomas (no ‘J’), you’d be a self-conceited PAIN… elsewhere.

          • Mr Keith Charles Johnson

            You are in fine form. You brought up the Jehovah Witness Bible. This is a book that didn’t come into being until the 20th century, and it is based on the writings of Charles Taze Russel and Joseph Franklin Rutherford. This is nothing more than a cult following. I sir am not a Jehovah Witness, nor do I believe their teachings, and when they come to my door peddling the Watchtower I politely tell them that I am not interested. Thank You very much.

            You also cited Douay-Rheims. This is a Roman Catholic interpretation. I enjoy how you nitpick. Pick one, and stick to it. I can wordsmith anything I like if I take bits and pieces from every book on the planet. All it really boils down to is who or what someone wants to believe. It’s a belief system based on faith, and I choose to believe the King James Version.

            Hebrews 11
            King James Version (KJV)
            1 “Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen”.

            (From THE Holy Bible)
            Revelation 22:18-19
            King James Version (KJV)

            18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him
            the plagues that are written in this book: 19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the
            holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

          • heroay

            i showed you that MANY different sources, secular, scientific, mystical, religious, lead to the same FACTS. You and your rabbinical gossip is full of bias and lies. Even your own side tracked publications show it.

            “…if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy…” – KJV

            Your KJV is preferred because it has forbidden annotations to dupe with them the ignorant masses. And truly, the ‘jews’ today rely on the talmud, not the Torah, yet you conveniently ignore it, and its putrid contents.

            And the references you submit, come from the Torah, but there are NO Hebrews today, and Americans are N.T. Christians, not ashkenazi talmudic ‘jews’.

            http://www.jesuswalk.com/manifesto/3_reconciliation.htM

            “…Many Christians are quick to throw out the Old Testament. “The God of the Old Testament,” they say, “is an angry, vengeful God. So different from Jesus.” Most Christians today are unfamiliar with the Old Testament. If anything, they bring only a New Testament to church, and act like the Old Testament NO LONGER HAS ANY AUTHORITY.”

            And it never did for Christians, much less, the talmudic abomination. But the OT was attached as “judo-Christian Bible” to manipulate and destroy Christianity. Which you are helping though failing.

          • Mr Keith Charles Johnson

            You must be a Neo-Nazi because you are nothing more than a hater. You continually bring up the Jews, the Talmud, “rabbinical gossip”.?? Why gossip, because you don’t believe it? Simply because you don’t believe it doesn’t make it untrue, and all of your references were written in CE, times way beyond the dead sea scrolls, and the Greek from which the Holy Bible was translated into English. You say that Americans are N.T. Christians?? Who have you been listening to? I’m an American, and I am a Christian, and I don’t limit myself to only 27 books of the best selling book in the world; i.e., Our Holy Bible, and it is called the Holy Bible, not the Holy New Testament. Without the Old Testament there is no New Testament. Please wake up, and open your eyes and your mind. If you ever stay at a hotel or a motel you will find a Holy Bible in the nightstand next to the bed or in the desk drawer, and it’s the entire Bible not just the New Testament.

            http://www.biblegateway.com/

            Re; Wikipedia
            “Although Christians hold different views from Jews about the Old Testament. Christians regard both the Old and New Testaments together as sacred scripture”.

            You say there are no Hebrews today, but that is the language of the Jews, and there is the Book of Hebrews in the New Testament. Jew is modern day language( American English) for Hebrew. The Jews ARE Hebrews, your ignorance is showing.

            Hebrew: Definition from Answers.com – Answers – The Most …

            http://www.answers.com › Library › Literature & Language › Dictionary

            Hebrew n. A member or descendant of a Semitic people claiming descent from Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; an Israelite; a Jew

            Now put that in your Hopium pipe and smoke it, you little troll. Once again, I tell you go read a history book, you don’t understand the Bible. Try the Geneva 1599, maybe that’s more to your liking, and I am not a Jew so try some other tact. Also when I go to church I bring the complete Holy Bible, not just the N.T. I don’t know which church you attend , but Baptists believe the whole Bible. If the Old Testament is “thrown out”, as you so elegantly stated it, how do you explain the prophecy of Isaiah
            (BTW Isaiah is NOT from the Torah) that should frost your cookies.

            Isaiah 53:3-6

            New King James Version (NKJV)

            3 He is despised and rejected by men,
            A Man of sorrows and acquainted with grief. And we hid, as it were, our faces from Him; He was despised, and we did not esteem Him. 4 Surely He has borne our griefs, And carried our sorrows; Yet we esteemed Him stricken, Smitten by God, and afflicted. 5 But He was wounded for our transgressions,
            He was bruised for our iniquities;The chastisement for our peace was upon Him, And by His stripes we are healed. 6 All we like sheep have gone astray; We have turned, every one, to his own way; And the Lord has laid on Him the iniquity of us all.

            Your last paragraph follows:
            “And it never did for Christians, much less, the talmudic abomination.
            But the OT was attached as “judo-Christian Bible” to manipulate and
            destroy Christianity. Which you are helping though failing”.

            I’m including your closing paragraph to illustrate your stupidity. To wit:

            it’s not “talmudic” it’s Talmudic, and it’s not “judo-Christian” it’s Judeo-Christian. For you to call it an abomination, is an abomination in God’s eyes. You better go reread the New Testament. Also the OT wasn’t attached to the Judeo-Christian Bible, it’s the other way around. The New Testament came much later, about 60 A.D. Once again get your history straight., and you say I’m failing?? I do not know who you have been listening to, but I feel sorry for you
            and I pray for your soul if you believe that “the Old Testament NO LONGER
            HAS ANY AUTHORITY.”

            Please reread Revelation 22:18-21

            http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Revelation 22&version=NT

            ================================
            You will probably say that this is a lie also, but once again you have no proof.

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ten_Commandments_(1956_film)

            ===============================
            Luke 16:14-16

            New King James Version (NKJV)

            The Law, the Prophets, and the Kingdom

            14 Now the Pharisees, who were lovers of money, also heard all these things, and they derided Him. 15 And He said to them, “You are those who justify yourselves before men, but God knows your hearts. For what is highly esteemed among men is an abomination in the sight of God.

            16 “The law and the prophets were until John. Since that time the kingdom of God has been preached, and everyone is pressing into it.
            ===============================
            Revelation 21:26-27

            New King James Version (NKJV)

            26 And they shall bring the glory and the honor of the nations into it.[a] 27 But there shall by no means enter it anything that defiles, or causes[b] an abomination or a lie, but only those who are written in the Lamb’s Book of Life.

            Footnotes:

            a. Revelation 21:26 M-Text adds that they may enter in.

            b..Revelation 21:27 NU-Text and M-Text read anything profane, nor one who causes.

            Acts 11:25-27

            New King James Version (NKJV)

            25 Then Barnabas departed for Tarsus to seek Saul. 26 And
            when he had found him, he brought him to Antioch. So it was that for a
            whole year they assembled with the church and taught a great many
            people. And the disciples were first called Christians in Antioch.

            Relief to Judea

            27 And in these days prophets came from Jerusalem to Antioch.

            Christians weren’t even called Christians until after Christ’s death and resurrection. Jesus was born a Jew, and was considered a Rabbi or teacher while he was alive. His actual ministry only spanned three years after he turned thirty(30) years old, and he was crucified when he was thirty-three(33).

            New Testament

            From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_testament

            This article is about the Christian Greek Scriptures. For the theological concept, see New Covenant.

            Books of the New Testament

            Gospels

            Matthew · Mark · Luke · John

            Acts

            Acts of the Apostles

            Epistles

            Romans

            1 Corinthians · 2 Corinthians

            Galatians · Ephesians

            Philippians · Colossians

            1 Thessalonians · 2 Thessalonians

            1 Timothy · 2 Timothy

            Titus · Philemon

            Hebrews · James

            1 Peter · 2 Peter

            1 John · 2 John · 3 John

            Jude

            Apocalypse

            Revelation

            The New Testament (Koine Greek: Ἡ Καινὴ Διαθήκη, Hē Kainḕ Diathḗkē) is the second major part of the Christian biblical canon, the first part being the Old Testament. Although Christians hold different views from Jews about the Old Testament. Christians regard both the Old and New Testaments together as sacred scripture. The contents of the New Testament deal explicitly with first-century Christianity. Therefore, the New Testament (in whole or in part) has frequently accompanied the spread of Christianity around the world. It reflects and serves as a source for Christian theology.
            Both extended readings and phrases directly from the New Testament are
            also incorporated (along with readings from the Old Testament) into the
            various Christian liturgies. The New Testament has influenced not only religious, philosophical, and political movements in Christendom, but also has left an indelible mark on its literature, art, and music.

          • Mr Keith Charles Johnson

            I checked your January 3rd post, and they won’t let me reply to it. It’s under moderation, and therefore considered inactive. I guess that you wrote one that even the moderators think you’re goofy. I could at least read it though, so here’s your answer.

            You are an ignorant hater. Why do you hate Jews? Just answer me that without all of your horse$#!+. Which “church” do you belong to? I see that the Jehovah Witnesses don’t go to church. They go to the Kingdom Hall. Now who’s “intentionally and deceitfully” translating? Does this mean that the Jehovah Witness’s are Essene?

          • heroay

            i’ll get my previous reply to you, blindfolded fanatic moron, ‘moderated’, to see if it passes inspection. With LINKS instead of direct quotes, since ‘subliminal sensitivities’ only look to the right, while they keep a shut eye to the LEFT. Let’s see, temporarily, if THIS ‘passes: You are the most ignorant pretentious religious fanatic i have read on the Net. An inscribed ROCK has more to tell than you. And it has no ILL alliance to questionable organisms.

          • Mr Keith Charles Johnson

            And you sir are a disturbed young?? man. I’m assuming that you’re young by the way you come off calling me a “blindfolded, fanatic moron”. Babble, babble, babble…, and then you go on to say “You are the most ignorant pretentious religious fanatic i have read on
            the Net. An inscribed ROCK has more to tell than you. And it has no
            ILL alliance to questionable organism”.
            Which “questionable organism” are you referring to?

            WTFO, ?? Now your true colors show troll! This defense proves your lack of knowledge, and it is the response of a typical liberal progressive whose mantra is, “Don’t Confuse Me With The Facts~My Mind’s Made Up”. BTW, I am no more a religious fanatic than yourself. So go back to your parents basement, and play with yourself for awhile, and when you can come up with some references and support for your lame-ass argument come back with a permission slip from your mommy, and we’ll play some more.

            http://youtu.be/M-ow9mkWuEI

          • heroay

            Am not your teacher, nanny, or asylum guardian, dumb troll. Go search for yourself, if you are allowed to use the computer for over an hour at a time. i can image what you were like at age 12, pity, if by 65 (according to your own estimates…) you are a complex piece of garbled babbling and constant reference to your ‘infallible’ and distorted KJV.

            What a waste of life, 65 years and haven’t even realized ALL the fallacies, lies, distortions, and editing these pariahs from Shinar have introduced in BOTH texts, which you apparently haven’t even noticed. Unless, you are paid to look the other way, while pretending to recruit sheeple for the lost cause, your JWO.

            And the only reason i have followed your tripe, is to expose you to other readers as a disinformant for the ashkenazi talmudics pretending to control Christianity through the joining of two entirely different religious tests, if so-called ‘judaism’ (much less talmudism), can be called ‘religion’.

            Yes, you have been quite BO-ring and useless, even if it hurts your self aggrandized ego.

          • Mr Keith Charles Johnson

            Wow, you sure are one great big bag of hot air. The only thing holding you on the ground is that extremely large pile of horse$#!+ you’re toting around speaking of self aggrandizement. You write ” i can image what you were like at age 12″ ?? There were no PC’s when I was 12, your ignorance is showing. Better hit reset for your brain. I know that peanut can’t hold much RAM so you probably go “blue-screen” quite often. Explain this gem of yours, “for the lost cause, your JWO”. Which lost cause? It can’t be mine because you’ll have to explain your acronym “JWO” . I’m including the definition of religion because you seem to have your doubts since you placed quotation marks on the word religion when you used the word religion in your post. It’s almost like you don’t like to use the word religion.?

            http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/religion?s=t

            re·li·gion [ri-lij-uhn] noun

            1. a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.

            2. a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects: the Christian religion; the Buddhist religion.

            3. the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices: a world council of religions.

            4. the life or state of a monk, nun, etc.: to enter religion.

            5. the practice of religious beliefs; ritual observance of faith.

            Finally this is the biggest example of your inflated self-importance, pride, and ego of this entire discussion. Your post is as follows. “And the only reason i have followed your tripe, is to expose you to other readers as a disinformant for the ashkenazi talmudics pretending
            to control Christianity through the joining of two entirely different
            religious tests, if so-called ‘judaism’ (much less talmudism), can be
            called ‘religion’”.

            Which “tests” are you writing about? No such thing as judaism or talmudism. You refer to my writing as tripe, how do you explain your claptrap and bloviation. You include words such as ashkenazi, is this suppose to make you look like you know what your talking about? It doesn’t, it’s just a sect of Judaism from the 1830′s from Germany and Eastern Europe, and. their pronunciation of Hebrew is what defines them, but it doesn’t change the fact that they are Jewish. You only brought it up because it has nazi in its spelling. Therefore , it must be bad. Faulty logic, you better reset your peanut again. Here’s something else to contemplate, and since you “threw stones” at the King Jame Version of the Holy Bible, I got this from one of the versions you had spoke of in your hackneyed claptrap. If what you say is true about exposing me to other readers, where are all of your “up” votes on your expose`.

            Proverbs 16:18

            Douay-Rheims 1899 American Edition (DRA)

            18 Pride goeth before destruction: and the spirit is lifted up before a fall.

            Now before you go upstairs, and check in with your parents, take another hit off the ganja you got in your bong next to your monitor, and chillax.

            http://youtu.be/TIMrFpnfvyI

            http://youtu.be/TIMrFpnfvyI

          • heroay

            Not name-calling. Just… calling your proper tag… Dumbtard Plump Senile Windbag Full-o-Gass. Wasted life… So Obtuse (and obese), you don’t even realize i have X-Posed your fetid Fill-a-Diaper on this tread, for what you really are; pompous repetitive know-nothing one-track copy-and-paste mindless senile moronic troll for the JWO. Read that?…

            Now, Mr. Methane-Sulphur Windbag, should you dare accept your assignment to restore your downward spiraling fractal brain into a ‘possible’ human state, read my other messages, copy-cat the links and leads (in HTML, dummy!), and TRY, try your best to START becoming a human being instead of a dead beat pretentious TROLL for your tall-mud maniacs, and perhaps save your soul from Eternal Damnation.

            Also, entertain yourself in your free time (!) by guessing (what else?) about my “i”. In your Neanderthal-but-above-the-cave-stage, it would make NO sense inside your cranial environment, even if i told you. You are NOT ‘there’ yet, and won’t. Too old, decadent, and wayward for the lesson. Pity.

            Now, turn on the air-extractor, and flush yourself when you finish.

          • Mr Keith Charles Johnson

            And your point is? Name calling with a large amount of fanciful, nonsensical lies and ad hominem does nothing to enhance or hold up your prose. You need help, please go get some.

            “A fool cannot be protected from his folly. If you attempt to do so, you will not only arouse his animosity but also you will be attempting to deprive him of whatever benefit he is capable of deriving from experience. Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig”. Robert A. Heinlein

          • heroay

            KEEP YAKING…Dumbtard Plump Senile Windbag Full-o-Gass, you CANNOT convince a toad on your balding cranium.

            WORLD RELIGIONS:

            Christians………..33.3%
            Muslims……………21.0%
            Hindus……………..13.3%
            Buddhists…………..6.0%
            Other Religions…12.0%
            Deists………………12.0%
            Atheists………………2.3%
            talmudics…………….0.23% -o–(0o)?

            THAT’s WHY the ashkenazi talmudics HAD to attach themselves to Christianity in late 1800′s, else, they would have NO POWER over NOBODY!

            It’s time to shake off the sucking FLEAS on our shoulders. Make them LEARN to WORK for feed.

          • heroay

            LOL!! Keep X-Posing yourself! Dumbtard Plump Senile Windbag Full-o-Gass… WHO was talking about PC’s in your retard childhood, dunce? Were the Ancients ‘clicking’ their K-B’s to LEARN the Law? Even if the Rock of the Ages hits you on the head, you’ll remain obtuse.

            Now, low-life IQ 70 Neo-thal, grab this one: ‘religion’, tag for ‘uncontested faith’ and ‘irrational belief’. Or, dogma and creed. Read?

            BUT, ‘Religion’, that’s different. From ‘re-ligare’ (the wise French), ‘to tie, bundle together, that knowledge which transcends -o–(??)> the material plane’.

            Ah-yes, ‘votes’… Forgot to tell you, i cannot read all your farm fertilizer; it hurts the brain. Imagine disinterested passer-byes? They just SKIP-HOP your green blob. And…

            ‘JewTube ref’… GASP! Gimme-a-break.

          • Mr Keith Charles Johnson

            There you go again with that “JewTube” reference. YOU are a hater, and all that’s all there is to it. All that you do is to troll the thread, and make unsubstantiated caustic remarks, and epithets. You are also a name caller par excellant, and please crawl back under whatever rock you crawled out from, and play with yourself if you’ve got anything to play with. This will be my last post to you, and it’s not because I’m shutting my mouth, it’s because your stupid ass isn’t worth anymore of my time, nor are you worth anybody’s time. Go cry to your mommy, maybe she’ll wipe your ass for you.

          • heroay

            BLAH-BLAH…Dumbtard Plump Senile Windbag Full-o-Gass, you CANNOT convince a toad on your balding cranium.

            WORLD RELIGIONS:

            Christians…………33.3%
            Muslims……………21.0%
            Hindus……………..13.3%
            Buddhists…………..6.0%
            Other Religions…12.0%
            Deists………………12.0%
            Atheists……………..2.3%
            talmudics…………..0.23% -o–(0o)?

            THAT’s WHY the ashkenazi talmudics HAD to attach themselves to Christianity in late 1800′s, else, they would have NO POWER over NOBODY!

            It’s time to shake off the sucking FLEAS on our shoulders. Make them LEARN to WORK for feed.

          • Mr Keith Charles Johnson

            Nice lead in. Did you stay up all night thinking about it? All you know how to do is throw insults and tell lies. I’m not trying to convince you of anything since you know it all already, and your mind is closed tighter than your boyfriend’s rectum. Ad Hominem and its ugliness are your trademarks you xenophobic sum-bitch. Why is it so hard for you to call the Jews by their common name? You’re so hung up on ashkenazi talmudic. Why is that? The Ashkenazim aren’t even from Israel, and they are not descendents of the ancient Israelites or Hebrews.
            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenazi_Jews

            Additionally, your 0.23% figure is correct, but the lists of World Religions that I looked at called them JEWS, not talmudics. I think I’ll start calling you villianay, because you are no hero except in your own addled peanut

            http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Ashkenazimbrain.

            Ash·ke·naz·im [ahsh-kuh-nah-zim]

            plural noun, singular Ash·ke·naz·i [ahsh-kuh-nah-zee] Show IPA .
            Jews of central and eastern Europe, or their descendants, distinguished from the Sephardim chiefly by their liturgy, religious customs, and pronunciation of hebrew.

          • heroay

            Am not as resource-less and retard as you, Dumbtard Plump Senile Windbag Full-o-Gass. This is OLD stuff, c. 2007. DUMB! But thanks to YOUR dumb insistence, i COINED the ‘jew-daic Connection’. And now it travels around the world…Dumbtard Plump Senile Windbag Full-o-Gass. Don’t you feel guilty and depressed? Even, suicidal?

            Christians………..33.3%
            talmudics…………..0.23% -o–(0o)?

            “THAT’s WHY the ashkenazi talmudics HAD to attach themselves to Christianity in late 1800′s, else, they would have NO POWER over NOBODY!” Maggots! Leeches! Pariahs! The Plague!…Where’s RAID!?!

          • Mr Keith Charles Johnson

            I know you are but what am I???

          • heroay

            Dumbtard Plump Senile Windbag Full-o-Gass…

            Christians………..33.3%
            talmudics…………..0.23% -o–(0o)?

            “THAT’s WHY the ashkenazi talmudics HAD to attach themselves to Christianity in late 1800′s, else, they would have NO POWER over NOBODY!” Maggots! Leeches! Pariahs! The Plague!… Where’s RAID?!

          • heroay

            References? At your advanced age, seems like senility has made progress beyond expectations. Go get your nanny to help you do a simple search based on the links and leads i gave you, since your fractal brain programming denies you the ability to think straight, or for yourself.

            Now i wonder even, in your incapacitated condition, are you made to wear adult pampers? You are beginning to smell like you need a change for the better.

          • Mr Keith Charles Johnson

            You are beginning to smell like you need a change for the better.You sound like you’re stuck in an endless loop of inane nonsense because there are no links in your horse$#!+. Better check them, and include them all in one post so I can determine that you’re not the one in an incapacitated condition. All you know how to do is name call and throw snarky, sarcastic, childish epithets. Every time you use the lower case i when referring to yourself instead of the Upper case I. You seem to be able to properly capitalize the remainder of your prose properly. Do you use the lower case i because it’s the first letter of inferior? And unless you’ve got “smellavision” on your monitor you don’t have a clue about my condition, therefore, when you say, “You are beginning to smell like you need a change for the better”, you must be writing about yourself. By the way you speak of my advanced age, you must be the one still in diapers. Beat your keyboard until your fingers bleed you little troll. If brains were dynamite you wouldn’t have enough to blow your nose. Now is that juvenile enough for you or should I send you some instructions on the use of crayons and a coloring book so that you can really have some fun in your spare time?

          • heroay

            You are a FAILED anti-Christian troll. Your Freudian psycho-lology cannot attach ‘hate’ to my mouth, simpleton. i am X-Posing the tribal lies, hate, and falsity.

            YOU answer me in accord with MY posted points, not with your fractal brain spiraling babble.

            i quit the Catholic Church at age 12, fed up with the LIES in the Bible… Alas! i didn’t know then, i was being read the OT!! NO wonder! i must have been born a Natural Christian! Thank Heavens!

            Jehovah W., Essene?!? LOOOOL!! They are as LOST as YOU are!! Thanks for the laugh, coz ye ARE bo-ring!!

            “intentionally and deceitfully”… that was done at one point or other, by the Roman Church. ANY reference in the early years to the Nazarenes, would have changed the course of Catholicism, and the Orthodox Church, which today claims THAT ‘church’ mentioned in Matthew 18:17 was their Orthodox church. NONSENSE!

            “Truth is more amazing, awesome, than the best fabricated fantasy.”

          • Mr Keith Charles Johnson

            Let’s see here (your words)
            “You are a FAILED anti-Christian troll”
            “Freudian psycho-lology”
            “simpleton”
            “fractal brain spiraling babble”.
            “They are as LOST as YOU are!! Thanks for the laugh, coz ye ARE bo-ring!!”
            “intentionally and deceitfully”… that was done at one point or other, by the Roman Church.” ( when?, and now you bring up the Roman Church. The last time it was some other group. Your story changes like the weather). You claim “ANY reference in the early years to the Nazarenes, would have changed the course of Catholicism, and the Orthodox Church”. (Which early years? Which Orthodox Church? Russian, Greek, what? and changed in what way? Talk about psycho babble. Where do you come up with this horse$#!+? You say, “i quit the Catholic Church at age 12, fed up with the LIES in the Bible”. Age 12? when was that , just yesterday? At age12 you weren’t mature enough to discern Biblical Truth anymore than you are now. How do you know the Bible was LIES? What was your reference, and who told you that they were lies? What did you have to compare your conclusion with? You cited Matthew, so I see that you’re still hooked on the New Testament so here:

            http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark+8:32-34&version=NKJV
            Mark 8:32-34
            New King James Version (NKJV)

            32 He spoke this word openly. Then Peter took Him aside and began to rebuke Him. 33 But when He had turned around and looked at His disciples, He rebuked Peter, saying, “Get behind Me, Satan! For you are not mindful of the things of God, but the things of men.”

            Take Up the Cross and Follow Him

            34 When He had called the people to Himself, with His disciples also, He said to them, “Whoever desires to come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow Me.

            Therefore, “GET THEE BEHIND ME SATAN”. You “heroay” are as full of it as a Christmas goose. You start off by by name-calling me with a whole tirade of lies and unproven premises, and then you cap it off by saying, “ye are bo-ring”. “ye”?? When did you revert to Old English, and if I’m boring, why do you come back for more. Name-calling is a tactic of a liberal progressive, and their mantra is, “Don’t Confuse Me With The Facts~My Mind’s Made Up”. I’m surprised that you didn’t call me a racist. That’s the fall back for most liberals. They yell racist real loud and leave. You say you quit the Catholic Church at age 12?? Your parents must have believed your story about the Priest making advances or the nuns whacking your fingers with a ruler. Which was it? Other than that I would think that responsible parents would be concerned about their child’s spiritual or religious growth. Which denomination did you seek after you turned your back on Catholicism? Other churches use some version of the same Holy Bible, and what makes you think that the New Testament isn’t LIES also since it was translated by the same group of scholars who translated the Old Testament. So I guess that you have your homework cut out for you.
            I don’t know how much schooling you’ve had, but generally references are the backbone of any plausible argument, and teachers and professors don’t accept papers without them. So put references in your next diatribe. Thank You, and BTW if I’m a failure, that makes you a loser because I answered your crap even though you make feel that I’m “bo-ring’. That’s a “valley-girl” pronunciation of boring BTW. Grow UP.

            http://www.quotationspage.com/quotes/

            “Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence”. John Adams (1735 – 1826), ‘Argument in Defense of the Soldiers in the Boston Massacre Trials,’ December 1770

          • heroay

            Am not your teacher, nanny, or asylum guardian, dumb troll. Go search for yourself, if you are allowed to use the computer for over an hour at a time. i can image what you were like at age 12, pity, if by 65 (according to your own estimates…) you are a complex piece of garbled babbling and constant reference to your ‘infallible’ and distorted KJV.

            What a waste of life, 65 years and haven’t even realized ALL the fallacies, lies, distortions, and editing these pariahs from Shinar have introduced in BOTH texts, which you apparently haven’t even noticed. Unless, you are paid to look the other way, while pretending to recruit sheeple for the lost cause, your JWO.

            And the only reason i have followed your tripe, is to expose you to other readers as a disinformant for the ashkenazi talmudics pretending to control Christianity through the joining of two entirely different religious tests, if so-called ‘judaism’ (much less talmudism), can be called ‘religion’.

            Yes, you have been quite BO-ring and useless, even if it hurts your self aggrandized ego.

          • heroay

            LONG before there were ‘hateful nazis’, there were Franklin and Washington. Yes, the FOUNDERS. And they both wanted the [CENSORED] (ashkenazis) OUT of America. FOR EVER.

            Franklin – Statement at the Constitutional Convention, 1789.
            Washington – ‘Maxims of George Washington’.
            http://www.stormfront.org/jewish/antisemite.html

            “Scrolls”? Get this through your brain:

            “Essene and Christian Parallels and Commonalities” (Google)
            …The church fathers also assert that the Essene originated the Christian religion… Eusebius, a standard ecclesiastical writer of the fourth century, asserts in his History of the Church:

            “Those ancient Therapeuts (Essene) were Christians, and their ancient writings were our gospels.”

            In Matthew 18:17, the Christ clearly says: (ANY Bible)

            “tell it to the church”… before Christians claim there was a church. The Essene held assemblies and congregations, which are words [intentionally and deceitfully] translated as ‘church’.”

            There goes the [CENSORED] claim that [CENSORED] founded Christianity. “Without OT, no NT”… Barf!

            Americans + Christians + New Testament: (Again)
            http://www.jesuswalk.com/manifesto/3_reconciliation.htM

            The [CENSORED] who OWN all printing presses, are distributing the [CENSORED] paste up all over, to keep the scheme alive.

            Wicked-pedia? Another source to you? A CIA-Mossad site to CONFUSE and disinform the sheeple. Google.

            You are super ignorant, or super indoctrinated. HEBREWS were the (claimed) sons of Eber (2200 BC), son of Shem. And we cannot trace the dispersed disobedient Yacobites (722 BC) and Yehudim (584 BC), yet you claim you know WHO are the Hebrews TODAY??

            And the language of the [CENSORED] (ashkenazis) today is NOT Hebrew, it’s Yiddish. “Answers.com”, your source?? NO wonder you stay so ignorant.

            ALL denominations besides the Catholic were wedges BY the [CENSORED], ask Martin Luther; to destroy the Roman Church, the one obstacle THEN to control the sheeple by these ashkenazi [CENSORED].

            “letter ‘j’ invented”. Sit down first.
            http://www.judaismvschristianity.com/how_the_name.htm

            Isaiah (8th c BC) or NOT, the Christ STILL would have been BORN. The Essene Scroll “The Righteous Man” awaits for him, just 14 years before his birth (Encyclopedia Britannica). So? No Scroll, no Christ? You are a childish and obtuse zionist denier.

            Are you so ignorant that you don’t know your talmud claims that Mother Mary was a [CENSORED], and her son is in hell in a pool of [CENSORED]? But in life, what you wish is what you get.
            http://www.talmudunmasked.com/

            The Christ a ‘jew’? Have you checked YET the TAGS ‘jew’-’Jesus’, not invented at that time? A ‘jew’ born in Galilee of the Gentiles? Persecuted by a ‘jew’ Edomite Herod? Sell you a golden calf.

            ‘Christianity’ was AFTER the Christ in his honor, but prior, he was called THE NAZARENE… of the Nazarene SECT… the ESSENE, “the brethren in white”. Ask Iosephus (no ‘J’ then). Sheer ignorance, or colluded silence?

            “Lie feigns ‘King’, until Truth STOMPS all over it. With a vengeance.” Your insistence is puerile.

          • Brian Westley

            “You may be partially right, but I am not completely wrong”

            You were wrong in saying I spelled it wrong; it’s like saying “Chanukah” is spelled wrong.

          • heroay

            kanuckha, shanukah, same bleeding thing.

          • Smart Leads

            If you read Daniel 7:13, the prophet sees a son of man (the Aramaic phrase being BAR ENASH which means HUMAN BEING). This HUMAN in Daniel’s vision “..came on the clouds of Heaven (ONLY Holy beings in the OT are ever described as “coming on clouds”)..approached the Ancient of Days and was led in his presence (a human in God’s presence?)..He was given AUTHORITY, GLORY, and SOVEREIGN POWER; all nations and peoples of every language WORSHIPPED Him.

            Daniel has a vision of a human being, worshipped, and given sovereign power over all the nations in the presence of God. I’m not sure how Jewish people reconcile that verse…It’s worth a look.

          • heroay

            this dummy is a zionist ashkenazi talmudic troll. He only knows what he was brainwashed at the latrine.

          • heroay

            Flush yourself on the way down.

          • Karen Lee King

            A mere human?!? Jesus is God’s only begotten son!! You know if you would read God’s word you would know this.

          • Brian Westley

            “Jesus is God’s only begotten son!!”

            Not according to Jews or any other non-Christian. You do realize that not everyone on earth believes in your mythology, right?

          • Pamela K. Cahoon Laub

            The world counts time by Jesus Christ. It s now 2014 a.d. – anno domini – after the Lord. Even Jews must use that on a daily basis for business, even if thei religious holidays use the old calendar.

          • Brian Westley

            And today in the US is named after the Norse god Odin and the month after the Roman god Janus.

          • heroay

            But so DO ALL of you ashkenazi ‘jews’! “When in Rome, do as the Romans DO…” And YOU DO!. Swallow.

          • Pamela K. Cahoon Laub

            Every day is a.d.

          • Brian Westley

            Except when it’s CE

        • Brian Westley

          Like I said, example, please. Specific instances, not handwaving.

          In the case of schools and xmas carols, not singing religious songs in a public school is NOT an infringement of your freedom of religion. If it was, schools would have to sing religious songs of any student in the school or be guilty of infringement.

          As for your business example, I assume you’re referring to business refusing to serve gay customers, which is not an infringement either.

          • sunny733

            Are you crazy? Are you familiar with Madalyn Murray O’Hair?
            Look her up, learn a bit.
            peace

          • Brian Westley

            “Look her up, learn a bit. I’m a paralegal, it’s not hard to find more information if you want.”

            I’m not the one claiming that atheists are trying to squash other people’s freedom of religion. People like butterflyinoh claim that, but come up with no specific examples, just general raving.

          • sunny733

            Actually, you’re getting quite boring. You know what’s going on. You’re a troll, obviously you don’t have a life, because all day you’ve been on here.
            Well, I have one. Do whatever you want, I don’t care. You are the one lacking in something you will never understand, nor do I care if you want to or not.
            I want to go out and enjoy the world. Have fun being a troll on the internet, loser. And you are one, because anyone who has a life like you, well, when you’re dead, you are nothing, aren’t you?
            LOL…peace, if you can find any.

          • Brian Westley

            “Actually, you’re getting quite boring”

            Reciting facts tends to be boring.

          • sunny733

            LOL, I just got this before I was going out…you really are an ass, I thought you wanted facts…I guess you are in a fantasy world. And a complete ass.
            Bye, weird one. I’m not going to even bother with you anymore…LOL….what a weirdo.

          • Brian Westley

            “LOL, I just got this before I was going out.”

            You keep saying you’re going to leave, and then you don’t.

          • heroay

            It’s very difficult to leave when such a good spittoon is on sight.

          • heroay

            Real asses like grass. This fabricated ass likes kicking in the mouth. For starters.

          • BlueMax372

            Are you a paid troll?

          • Brian Westley

            Why yes, yes I am.

          • heroay

            You didn’t have to admit it, it SHOWS a mile away. And stinks, even further.

          • heroay

            ZIO-troll. He reads the talmud.

          • heroay

            the clown is right now sitting in a tel aviv latrine. He is paid by post, and must make some dollars or starve. Or, have to go and steal from the Palestinians.

          • heroay

            he is a zionist troll. Wound up, and unstoppable, until he unwinds himself.

          • sunny733

            p.s.
            The Armed Forces just banned the word “Christmas,” also. How’s that for free speech.
            peace

          • Brian Westley

            The Armed Forces just banned the word “Christmas,”

            Citation needed.

          • TexasJester

            Search for it yourself — that way you’ll believe it more. You’re so used to having everyone do everything for you, I wonder if you even know how..

          • Brian Westley

            “Search for it yourself”

            Well, I found this:

            So what does the Army have to say about the DEOMI officer’s edict?

            “There is no policy at the 158th Infantry Brigade, First Army Division East or First Army that forbids using the word ‘Christmas’,” Public Affairs Chief Amanda Glenn told me.

            Fail.

          • sunny733

            cite, please? I googled your sentence, yet came up with nothing.
            MAJOR FAIL~

          • Brian Westley
          • heroay

            Wipe your bottom bottle glasses, dummy. Then read again.

          • sunny733

            Here, lazy troll-

            http://www.ibtimes.com/merry-christmas-or-happy-holidays-army-told-not-say-christmas-report-1519576

            p.s. I have more….where are yours?
            I’m going outside….I like to get my Vitamin D.

          • Brian Westley

            “There is no policy at the 158th Infantry Brigade, First Army Division East or First Army that forbids using the word ‘Christmas’,” Public Affairs Chief Amanda Glenn told Fox News.

            Fail

          • heroay

            FAIL, idiot. Ask George Washington. Dummy. Then flush yourself back into the latrine.

          • heroay

            You are acting DUMBER than you ARE. Shameless pathetic troll.

          • chamuiel

            businesses refusing to serve gay customers is not an infringement of our rights?

            How naieve you are.

          • Brian Westley

            “businesses refusing to serve gay customers and you complaining about it is not an infringement of our rights?”

            No, it isn’t. Public accomodation laws have been on the books for decades, and they’ve been found to be constitutional plenty of times.

          • TexasJester

            Remember the signs “We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason”?

          • Brian Westley

            Yep. They don’t countermand actual laws, you know.

          • TexasJester

            UNCONSTITUTIONAL laws.

          • Brian Westley

            Go ahead and challenge public accommodation laws then. They’ve survived such legal challenges in the past.

          • heroay

            Why? Because 70% of rapine lawyers, and 80% of corrupt judges are kosher indoctrinated zio-rats. Read their names, moron, we HAVE.

          • heroay

            Flush, dummy, flush, the latrine is overflowing with your… tripe.

          • heroay

            in the books, because of crooks in the legal system, corrupt dual-passport con-gress-critters, and zio-installed puppets like Obongo the illegal from Kenya. Ah-yes, the zio-tard Supremos, and the blackmailed black-robed homos

          • heroay

            how stupid and complicit he is. Zionist troll.

          • JW Olson

            Requiring a business to serve a customer that they do not wish to serve IS CLEARLY an infringement. If someone comes in acting like a complete jerk, you do not have to serve them because you find them morally wrong. Why is it that the government thinks that it should be able to force you to serve anyone that you find morally wrong. It is CLEARLY a violation of rights of the business owner on two major fronts.
            1. Freedom of religion.
            2. Government has NO authority to get involved in private industry. They have been radically violating the Constitution on this one for generations. That does not make it right.

            And why in the hell would someone who is gay want to pressure a business to serve them if they do not want to? Go to a business that wants your business if the first one does not want you there.

            If I were that cake maker, you can bet that the cake would NOT be made. I would make one that looked terrible and/or tasted terrible on purpose. There is no way in hell that I would let a customer or the government bully me.

          • Brian Westley

            “Requiring a business to serve a customer that they do not wish to serve IS CLEARLY an infringement.”

            Not when it’s a violation of public accomodation laws.

          • heroay

            NOTHING trumps the Constitution and Bill of Rights, zio-troll. Your kosher commerce clause and those puppy laws are good only as the people tolerate them. And the people are ready to kick your tribe’s rear bumper back to where you came from. 2% does NOT dictate to the 98%. Dumb troll.

          • Jon

            But “public accommodation laws” are unconstitutional as the federal government never had the authority to write them…and are therefore null and void by definition.

          • heroay

            and are always written by traitor dual-passport ashkenazis, like Schuma, Hillary, Peloski, Feinkenstein, Bloomberg, Lautenberg, Boxer, Ratafeller, Lieberman, AD NAUSEAM. But you can’t reprogram THIS zio-tard robotic moron with a recorder in his brian brain.

          • JW Olson

            Public accommodation laws are and unconstitutional violation of the rights of free business owners.

          • Brian Westley

            Then file a lawsuit. You might want to check out Heart of Atlanta Motel Inc. v. United States first.

          • pandainc

            OK, I’ll play along. Not so sure why, but what the heck…

            Common core is now teaching the tenets of Islam to kids, kids who are not allowed to sing Christmas carols or say ‘Merry Christmas’: A specific example which cannot be played off as fairness. You want fairness, teach comparative religion, including witchcraft, the Tao, Buddhism, etc., and see just how far that goes before the Muslims are raising h3ll about it.

            Business owners who won’t honor homosexual marriages. For a Christian who has actually read Scripture, as some have, homosexual behavior is a sin. If he were to deny service to a black because of the color of his/her skin, that is rank discrimination based on race and is heinous (and also unbiblical). If he does not serve (support) homosexual behavior, and the government demands that he does, that is certainly an infringement on his religious rights.

            Specific enuf? BTW, Merry Christmas!!

          • Brian Westley

            “Common core is now teaching the tenets of Islam to kids, kids who are not allowed to sing Christmas carols or say ‘Merry Christmas’: A specific example which cannot be played off as fairness.”

            That isn’t a specific example.

            What schools? Name names. What evidence do you have?

            “Specific enuf?”

            No. Where are names, dates, cites.

          • Well Done

            LOL Brian you are looking a complete bozo right here. You ask for cites then don’t accept them, and your citing of scripture helps us understand your lack of awareness. You’re a lunatic.

          • Brian Westley

            “You ask for cites then don’t accept them”

            No, I haven’t been given cites.

          • heroay

            Your nanny at the asylum is calling you back, trollie. Your diaper is FULL already…

          • heroay

            Bozo-Bah-Bozo, is the right tag for Brain Brian, the zio-troll with IQ-70 fractal cerebellum, and expert in talmudic subversion against Christianity. BTW, this is a NEW trend with these zio-trolls… they demand SPECIFIC heaps of links and info, then deny you provided any evidence. Dumb trolls.

          • pandainc

            Actually, it is specific enough to one who might be more open-minded. In your ‘quest’ for specificity, you have drilled down deeper and deeper through various posts on this thread. It wouldn’t matter with what evidences you are presented, you would find some reason to call them into doubt.

            Have fun in your little world.

          • Brian Westley

            “Actually, it is specific enough to one who might be more open-minded.”

            Open-mindedness has nothing to do with it. People here are claiming that Christians’ actual freedom of religion is being “squashed”, yet they haven’t been producing actual examples.

            “kids who are not allowed to sing Christmas carols or say ‘Merry Christmas’” was one such reply, but it isn’t an actual example. Is this at a public school? What state? If somebody’s religious rights have been infringed, is there a lawsuit?

            No information of that sort is given, just the unsupported claim that somewhere, sometime, some unnamed kids are not allowed to sing Christmas carols or say ‘Merry Christmas’.

            This isn’t even good enough to be a rumor, much less an example of people’s rights being threatened.

          • heroay

            Well, not quite ‘small’ world. It’s rather LONG. When he flushes himself and saves us from his pestilence, he will have more room to swim than here.

          • heroay

            Are you real? Can we see your birth card? You sound like a robotic dummy with a wind-up pre-recorded tape in your mouth.

          • heroay

            Majority rules, even in a Republic. Such as, in voting time (with ballots, not rigged machines). And the time comes for other religious celebrations, IF there are enough to celebrate, the do. Your mere presence in this forum is a perversion of life itself. Flush yourself.

        • pandainc

          Well said up to the word effective. Should have quit there — you’re not going to convict anyone by appealing to final judgement. The truly sad thing about the ‘atheist’ is that he has made his own religion and doesn’t even know it.

          • heroay

            his own religion is HIM/HERSELF. One step above the animal on the field. Neanderthal? Most likely.

        • Yvonne Snider Richards

          As long as one believes that Jesus is the Son of God and have excepted Him as their personal Saviour, be ye Jew or Gentile…you will see the Kingdom of Heaven, but as far as the Jewish people go…they are God’s chosen people for His linage…I’m not quite sure that will save them if they do not except Jesus as God’s Son. They are waiting for,as they were when Jesus was born…a great and glorious King. Christianity has been around since He came to save us…no matter how man tries to destroy Christianity, it cannot be and why would anyone try to destroy it? Because it is the truth.

          • heroay

            Hi, Vonnie! Not because it is the truth (Truth), but because the Master of the Law, the Christ, told their COUSINS (which zio-ashkenazis usurp today) the pharsical Pharisees, “your father the devil”… and they hate the NT, that’s why THEY joined NT & OT decades ago, to attack and destroy Christianity, and the New Testament. WHICH, these rabid rabbinos have demanded because it is “anti-Schmuck”. Come and GET IT, dummies!

      • Emma Brown

        You sound like an idiot, Brian…if you don’t know, or refuse to acknowledge that you DO know, than why should anyone waste their time trying to explain it to a thick-skulled individual such a yourself…

        • Charlie McKenna

          Um Emma Brown, I have been reading Brian’s posts and personally I find his thoughts very straightforward and cogent and well thought out. What he has done is what you should perhaps try. That is answer his ideas with FACTS and counter his arguments with a well thought out arguments of your own. But alas no. Instead you have done what so many of your right wing idiot conservatives always do and that is resort to ad hominem attacks.

          • BlueInfantry

            “right wing idiot conservatives” isn’t an ad hominem attack? Well, apparently not in your mind. :) Sounds like something a “left wing idiot Liberal” would say.

          • heroay

            ‘ziotic-leftard-idiotic-liberule’, by most modern nomenclature in Britannica.

          • George

            Yeah,..there was no ad hominem in your post.
            You’re perfect.

          • pandainc

            Well said, but perhaps she learned how to do ad hominem attacks by listening to left wing idiot progressives …

          • heroay

            add to the list, ‘ziotics’ (rhymes?), and you will have the complete kabal behind the attack on Christianity.

          • Well Done

            ummm, Charlie, Brian has ignored cites and continues to ask for them, and has cited scripture. If you can’t see the wooly-headed lunacy behind an atheist quoting scripture, you’re daft. Then, you go with “right wing idiot conservatives”, followed by a complaint about ad hominem. When faced with clueless ‘gainsaying, it’s appropriate to warn a person how they are coming off.

            But thanks for reminding us that most all atheists are fairly hard left, and usually academics. That means they think they know best. As you and Brian, have shown, they’re wrong. Too fun.

          • Brian Westley

            “Brian has ignored cites and continues to ask for them”

            No, I haven’t. Only one person has provide details for one specific example. Everything else has been general whining with no specifics, like where and when something actually happened.

          • heroay

            OINK, oink! Look at yourself in the mirror, ignoramus maximus. Before it breaks.

          • heroay

            Careful, the pretentious zio-troll moron has been quoting the talmud. Read ‘The Talmud Unmasked” -Pranaitis, murdered for uncovering the truth
            about that anti-Christ, anti-Christian, anti-humanity, trash book.

          • heroay

            Maquila, go for a walk, your fat belly is trolling, not your shallow brain.

        • heroay

          LOL!! No, dear Emma, he doesn’t ‘sound’, he IS an idiot! Fractal brian brain, low IQ 70 retard, Ziotic indoctrination in tel aviv to fudge forums, and ingrained rabbino brainwash anti-Christian with the talmud.

      • Beeta

        Brian it is an” in your face Christians” when they come out on Christmas to put up this display.. Why not celebrate atheist day with their display. I am sure they would not even bother to show up to place one if they did not have the reason to make a dig on Christians. Christmas Season is for Christ . And no displays should be there by another Group disrespectfully disrupting. Do your display on your on time and Holiday. It is Obvious that Satans servants, meaning yourself here, want to interfere with the Celebration of Christ’s birth. It is interfering with the rights of Christians to display and enjoy a traditional celebration that this Country was founded on… The should never have placed the A or sign there. An obvious dig to Christians . The atheist are the ones taking away the freedoms of the people in America… They may have a permit to place it there but the ulterior motive is infringing on the rights of religions.. You are wrong!

        • Brian Westley

          “Brian it is an” in your face Christians” when they come out on Christmas to put up this display.. ”

          When they COVER UP part of the atheists’ display, of course.

          • chamuiel

            when the atheists cover up part of the German display, of course3.

            Shouldn’t it work both ways?

          • Brian Westley

            When did the atheists cover up part of the German display?

          • Joe Swartz

            Whenever they want to stupid.

          • heroay

            i see… you don’t have your bottle bottom glasses when Christians are attacked, then pretend it does not happen. Yo’dumb!

          • Well Done

            They can cover up whatever they want, considering that most everything atheists do is targeted to people who aren’t atheists.

            Fun to see you’re so poorly raised that you don’t see your own obvious shortcomings regarding free speech.

          • heroay

            Low IQ 70 retard zio-trolls. That’s why the sound, write, and LOOK (picture) sooo dumb!

        • heroay

          Unfortunately, the Founders didn’t provide the US with a FLUSH LEVER, to just get rid of the anti-American pests on the spot. And back to the sewer in Shinar where they came from.

      • lovinspoonful

        Are you kidding me? There have been many examples of it for many months. Where have you been? Them and their group named Freedom from Religion. Leave and you can have all the freedom you can handle. The Constitution covers the Christians under Freedom of Religion, not the atheists and their group.

        • Brian Westley

          Like I said, come up with specific examples. Christians whine about many things that are NOT violations of their religious freedom.

          • lovinspoonful

            I gave you examples. Freedom of Religion is part of the Bill of Rights, Article 1 of the Constitution. Show me where Freedom from Religion is in the Constitution. One good example is your BIG ad in New York on the flowing sign on one of the large buildings downtown. Tasteless. there have been many examples and you know it as well as I do, so don’t up with this idiocy that you don’t know what we are talking about. It is stupid to act like you don’t know what we are talking about.

          • Brian Westley

            “I gave you examples.”

            No, you gave me generalities.

            Here’s a specific example:

            There is a lawsuit against Masterpiece Cakeshop in Denver for refusing to make a wedding cake for a gay wedding.

            See? THAT’S a specific example. An actual incident.

            “One good example is your BIG ad in New York on the flowing sign on one of the large buildings downtown. Tasteless.”

            Now, that IS specific.

            However, that’s not an example of atheists “trying to squash your freedom of religion”.

            That’s what I asked for. You claimed atheists “wants to squash our Freedom of Religion.”

            A sign that you find tasteless is NOT such an example.

          • allah_speaking

            >There is a lawsuit against Masterpiece Cakeshop in Denver for refusing to make a wedding cake for a gay wedding.

            Which has what to do with atheism precisely? Game set match, you lost your argument…

          • Brian Westley

            “Which has what to do with atheism precisely?”

            Nothing. It was a specific example of a specific example. A lot of people posting seem to have no idea what a specific example is.

          • Well Done

            Oh, thanks, Brian, for revealing yet another characteristic of atheists; they think they know best. You think you know best. You think quoting scripture is oh so impressive, not realizing that an atheist quoting scripture is a parody of his own daft mind.

          • Brian Westley

            ” they think they know best. You think you know best.”

            No, I just have to spell out what a specific example IS to the slower people out there like yourself.

          • chamuiel

            Merry Christmas, Brian!

          • Well Done

            You don’t define the terms here or anywhere else. You reject cites because you’re merely trolling. If you’re not trolling, you’re insane.

          • heroay

            That ziotic (rhymes?) troll Brain Brian DOES know what he is TRYING to say, but FAILS because he has NO foundation under the Constitution or Bill of Rights, to impose on Christians his talmudic ingrained training since he could read gibberish. Total ziotic persistent wacko.

          • chamuiel

            And you whine about many things that you should not be whining about.

            You whining about my religion is a violation of my religious freedom.

            let’ sstart with that one.

          • Brian Westley

            “You whining about my religion is a violation of my religious freedom. let’ sstart with that one.”

            OK.

            No, other people’s speech is not a violation of your religious freedom. My speech doesn’t affect your religious freedom at all.

            Done.

          • JW Olson

            Any federal law that blocks the free exercise of religion by anyone, anywhere is a violation of the Constitution. As a matter of fact any federal law which mentions religion in any way or infringes in any way is a violation. If you read the 1st Amendment it is very clear. It is in English…no interpretation required. And to those who point out that it does not say “separation of church and state,” you are right, but it does call for an absolute separation…but a separation is not what people think.

            “Congress shall pass no laws regarding the establishment or religion, not prohibiting the free exercise of”

            Take these two parts and it simply says:
            1. Congress can write no laws that establish a national religion.
            2. Congress can write no laws prohibiting ANYONE’S free exercise of religion ANYWHERE.

            It allows for NO federal laws regarding religion. It does not require banning any mention or display of religion on federal, state or private land by any citizen or government employee….it prohibits such federal bans.

            If a US Senator wanted to break out singing “Away in a Manger” on the Capitol steps…prohibiting it would be a violation of the Constitution. If a legislator wants the 10 Commandments on his office door, prohibiting that is a violation of the Constitution….just as mandating it would be.

          • Brian Westley

            “Any federal law that blocks the free exercise of religion by anyone, anywhere is a violation of the Constitution.”

            Conduct a Church of God Signs Following church service inside the White House then, and file a lawsuit when you are turned away.

          • JW Olson

            During Jefferson’s administration as VP and as Pres, the US Capitol was used as the largest church in the country each Sunday. So much for the way that Atheists try to claim that is “wall of separation” was intended.

          • heroay

            Your very presence on this tread is a violation of our God given, Constitutional given, Natural given, and Common Sense given RIGHTS to do what we want to do, without a brain-dead IQ-70 zio-punk PRETENDING to outsmart Christians in general. Flush yourself on the way out.

        • pandainc

          Sorry, lovin’ you’re dead wrong on that one. Here’s a question for you. If the Christ is indeed real (and he is) and his name is Jesus (which it is) and he is the redeemer of the elect (which he is) do you really think that a red (interesting choice of color, BTW) A is going to change that?

        • heroay

          Brain Brian, dead-beat zionist troll. Notice how he wants Christians be obedient to talmudic gibberish? That’s WHY these rabbinos joined the two Texts, New and Old, to pretend control and destroy Christianity from within. THEY invented the TAG ‘judeo-Christianity’ in late 1800′s, while the actual teaching today is not ‘judaism’ (a misnomer), but TALMUDISM. READ: ‘The Talmud Unmasked” -Pranaitis, murdered for uncovering the truth about that anti-Christ, anti-Christian, anti-humanity, trash book.

      • 50drvr

        Let me help butterflyinoh…..Merry Christmas!
        http://www.thomasmore.org/clear-and-present-danger-list-offenses-prepared-family-research-council

        Atheists offend me and most people. Their attempt to normalize deviance continues. Can’t believe our nation’s best fight and die for rights that these individuals pervert. Their activism is based on hate. People have had just about enough of this nonsense.

        • William T. Robbins

          How ignorant! By our nations best, I assume you mean the military. So our nation’s best includes atheists. Wake up.

          • JW Olson

            Yeah, our military includes Atheists…about 5% of them. And of that 5% over 99% could not care less whether there are religious displays…but over 87% of the military personnel are tired of the freedoms that they fight for being crushed by the 1/20 of 1% dictating to the masses in order to silence them.

          • William T. Robbins

            No one is being silenced. You seem to revel in dramatizing. Shaw AFB nativity scene. Moved to the chapel where it belongs. Wow silenced. Besides the “free expression” argument is just about dead. See oklahoma monument.

          • JW Olson

            removing traditional holiday decorations is prohibiting free expression. You can try to spin it, but you will fail. And the 1st does not say, nor prohibit free exercise of (religion), so long as it is in specific places.

          • Brian Westley

            The military stated that it was improper to put up the Shaw AFB nativity scene where it was first put up. So they moved it.

            If you still think it’s a violation FILE A LAWSUIT. If your reading of the law is correct you’ll win. Here, you’re just whining.

          • heroay

            Improper? Because all the gov departments are being run by UN-elected servants of Zion. Read their names, dummy. We have. And ask George Washington if it is wrong to place a Nativity set in a military compound. He would kick your flat rear all the way to tel aviv. If you are not squatting there.

            Lawsuit? The only wans to win would the ‘jew’ lawyers, 70% of the clan. And with 80% of federal ‘judges’ (administrators), hard to win the zionist occupation government these days. But wait for tomorrow. Retard troll.

          • William T. Robbins

            Remove them or allow all viewpoints. I spin nothing. Your side of the argument seems to have a problem with any expression but your own. Again see Oklahoma or the subject of the article.

          • Well Done

            Don’t dictate to people about “remove or allow all”. I know you young deviates have been told you know the real truth. You’ve been lied to. You know squat. Your half-baked pomposity is destroying the country.

          • William T. Robbins

            I am not exactly young. I am retired military. I took an oath to the constitution. The government doesn’t get to favor one religion or censor by viewpoint. Sorry you don’t understand that.

          • heroay

            Robbie… ask doggie, will you? You are an embarrassment to doggie. Shame.

          • heroay

            The zionists ruling the D.C. Latrine use these dumb serfs to do their dirty war against Christianity and the Republic.

          • Jon

            Nobody has rejected other viewpoints, but nice try.

          • JW Olson

            What other CHRISTMAS viewpoints have ever been requested to be presented? Ummm, that would be NONE.

          • heroay

            Mmmm…. it does NOT say “in specific places”. That’s what these zio-tards are trying to convince Christians on.

          • Well Done

            Lots of people are being “silenced”. Read the headlines.

          • heroay

            argue with a wall, you’ll get an echo. Argue with these zio-trolls, you will get pre-programmed mind control blathering.

          • heroay

            Let’s get back the US loyal Generals, removed since Dumbya Boosh, up to Obongo the illegal alien from Kenya. They would gladly kick your round bottom OUT of the Nativity scene just for objecting.

          • Well Done

            No atheists in foxholes. Your bud, Brian, has used the example of a gay couple wanting a cake made, which reminds us atheism comes from the same mindset as gay is good. all part of the hard left academy’s holier-than-thou edicts.

          • Brian Westley

            “No atheists in foxholes. ”

            http://militaryatheists.org

          • heroay

            most likely, un-evolved beings but who are definitely NOT ‘jews’ (ashkenazis), coz these are not supposed to fight the wars of their ashkenazi banksters wars.

          • heroay

            but not atheistic or talmudic ‘jews’, the subversives, since the Christ’s time, behind the persecution to Christians. Using ignorant patsies like you. NOT doggie, only Robbie!

        • heroay

          Above all, they hate TRUTH. And themselves, for being FALSE. And DUMB.

      • morgus

        atheists are nothing but a bunch of pussies period, attacking all things Christian then cowering when it comes to Muslims.

        • William T. Robbins

          Yeah not even true. Nice try though.

          • JW Olson

            Give an example of Atheists fighting against Muslim displays and actions which would (in their opinions) violate the separation of church and state. You can’t because they are not anti-religion they are anti-Christian…and they are afraid to stand up to the Muslims. Your “liar liar pants on fire” argument does no work.

          • William T. Robbins

            Name a single Muslim display on public land.

          • Well Done

            Name a single time atheists have opposed Islam. You atheists got the idea that YOU own public land. You atheists oppose centuries of tradition. You atheists quote laws written by academic atheists. What makes you think it’s right to oppose religious display on public land? That’s heinous stupidity. You cowards do NOT dictate terms.

          • Brian Westley

            “Name a single time atheists have opposed Islam. ”

            You typed that even though my reply was immediately below. Not too sharp, are you?

          • William T. Robbins

            Well there was the American Atheist billboard that said you know its a myth in Arabic. But don’t let facts confuse you. I do own public land same as you.

            Let me ask you something, why follow a religion so weak it can’t stand on its own and needs government support?

          • heroay

            “Weak, and needs gov support?” Your dog next to you seems to have more brains than you, Robbie. It doesn’t need gov. support, it needs THIS GOVERNMENT OUT OF IT. But then, with your shallow brain, how can you begin to comprehend the meaning of the Independence, Constitution, and Bill of Rights. Consult with doggie, Robbie, After you stop playing with it.

          • heroay

            It is not really THIS retard zio-troll. It’s the ashkenazi mafia usurping power at the D.C. Latrine, ZOG. This creep is just a tendril of the whole sewer spill.

          • heroay

            Prayer on the streets, dumb pretender. Hey doggie! Teach Robbie some arf-arf! He-Dumb!!!

          • Brian Westley

            “Give an example of Atheists fighting against Muslim displays and actions which would (in their opinions) violate the separation of church and state.”

            That doesn’t happen too much in the US, but in 2009 the MN ACLU sued the Tarek ibn Ziyad Academy for holding Muslim prayers and such. The school was shut down in 2011 due to their violations.

            American Atheists have also criticized Islam (and Judaism) as seen here:
            http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2012/03/01/atheist-group-targets-muslims-jews-with-myth-billboards-in-arabic-and-hebrew/

          • heroay

            Though not the pharsical Pharisees, but their cousins, since New Testament times, DIFFERENT from the Old, you were labeled a coward. The only way you ashkenazis will challenge Muslims, is atop a bomber, over a civilian population. Coward.

          • JW Olson

            Wow, I did not know that the ACLU was the Atheist Civil Liberties Union…

            As for the criticizing Islam and Judaism…did they try to get those displays removed…or simply mock them?

            Nice try, but you are not coming up with scenarios where these Atheist groups are suing for the removal.

          • Brian Westley

            “Wow, I did not know that the ACLU was the Atheist Civil Liberties Union…”

            It isn’t. If you bother to look, you’ll find where the ACLU has defended the rights of Christians, too.

            “As for the criticizing Islam and Judaism…did they try to get those displays removed…or simply mock them?”

            Did you even READ the link? Why no, you didn’t, because you apparently think the atheists were complaining about displays put up by Jews and Muslims, which is completely wrong.

            “Nice try, but you are not coming up with scenarios where these Atheist groups are suing for the removal.”

            I never claimed that. It was an example of a group of atheists criticizing Islam and Judaism, It was an example contradicting your incorrect statement of: “You can’t because they are not anti-religion they are anti-Christian…and they are afraid to stand up to the Muslims”

            They aren’t afraid to stand up to Muslims. By the way, what have YOU done?

            Now, in order to sue to have something removed, it has to be illegally erected, and I don’t know of any examples of Muslims doing that in the US. Usually, it’s Christians violating the law like that. Got any examples?

          • heroay

            Anti-Christian, as is the talmudic trash behind all attacks on America and Christianity. The LESSERS, 2% in America, dictating to 98% or so? Insanity, talmudic insanity. READ, “The Talmud Unmasked” – Pranaitis. AND, “The Protocols of the Wackos of Zion”. And wonder NO more!

      • Rob

        Freedom of speech doesn’t mean anytime, anywhere. This was targeted specifically to denigrate a CHRISTMAS market during the CHRISTMAS holidays. That’s akin to walking among minorities and using a racial epithet, and we know what would happen in that instance.

        • Brian Westley

          “This was targeted specifically to denigrate a CHRISTMAS market during the CHRISTMAS holidays.”

          So you would limit the first amendment based on, what, being offensive?

          • chamuiel

            Why would you then denigrate the Christians right to the first amendment?

          • heroay

            It’s not ‘atheists’. Check recent history of ‘atheists’ in America, and their NAMES. ALL, ashkenazi so-called ‘jews’ (a tag invented in the 13th c AD). The meager 0.23% of kosher egolaters in the world, trying to silence 33% of world Christians? Failed.

          • JW Olson

            The only ones trying to silence anyone in this case are those trying to silence the Christians. Nobody is trying to remove the “A”

          • Brian Westley

            Who is trying to silence the Christians? What are they doing to silence them?

          • heroay

            Your tribe, retard. The mere kosher intent to rule Christians with kosher ‘laws’, you all show your fractal brain disconnection with reality.

          • JW Olson

            Are you living in a bubble or are you just intellectually dishonest?

          • Brian Westley

            AH, a loaded question, how “intellectually dishonest” of you.

            I’m asking for specific instances of “those trying to silence the Christians”; usually, it means somebody is stopping Christians from misusing the government to promote Christianity, and nobody is being silenced.

          • JW Olson

            Every time an Atheist group sues to remove a cross, “under God” from the pledge, prohibit any person (including a federal employee), the right to pray in public, a student from praying in school (specifically, my daughter’s school tried to prevent students from praying over their meal…and this happens all over the country), it is an attempt to silence Christians.

            And the Constitution does not prohibit promoting religion. Jefferson had the US Capitol used as a church each Sunday during his time as VP and as president. That would be promoting religion. The ONLY prohibition of Congress and religion according to the US Constitution is that they do not PASS LAWS which establish a national religion.

          • Brian Westley

            “Every time an Atheist group sues to remove a cross,”

            From government land. That isn’t an infringement of your free speech.

            ” “under God” from the pledge”

            From a government-imposed pledge. That isn’t an infringement of your free speech.

            “prohibit any person (including a federal employee), the right to pray in public”

            Federal employees when acting in their official capacity represent the government, and have to be neutral on religion, not play favorites. That isn’t an infringement of your free speech.

            ” a student from praying in school (specifically, my daughter’s school tried to prevent students from praying over their meal…and this happens all over the country),”

            And they lost, correct? Welcome to the club — atheists have to sue to have their rights respected, too.

            Now, that last example IS an example, but it’s illegal for school officials to try and stop students from praying.

            “And the Constitution does not prohibit promoting religion.”

            Well, I and the courts disagree with that.

          • JW Olson

            1. Government land IS OUR LAND.
            2. Nobody IMPOSES the pledge. They give an opportunity to recite it…participate or not is your choice.
            3. As I pointed out, there is no prohibition in the US Constitution for federal or state employees to be neutral on religion, only that the federal government pass no LAWS regarding religion.
            It is an infringement on the federal/state employees’ free speech.

            The Constitution is very clear on the matter. It is in English and it does not need interpretation.

            Congress shall pass NO LAWS with regards to religion. If Congress mandated that federal/state employees follow a specific religion, that would be a violation.

            “….nor prohibiting the free exercise of.” This means ANY law passed to prohibit the free exercise of religion. There is no “…unless you are a federal/state employee” added to that.

            The problem with so many…such as yourself…is that you want to INTERPRET the Constitution. It was written in plain English and if you simply READ it without bias, it is very clear.

          • Brian Westley

            “1. Government land IS OUR LAND.”

            Yes, OURS. Which includes atheists. If you want to put up e.g. religious monuments, atheists get to put them up too.

            “2. Nobody IMPOSES the pledge. They give an opportunity to recite ”

            Young schoolchildren can’t make such a distinction.

            “3. As I pointed out, there is no prohibition in the US Constitution for federal or state employees to be neutral on religion,”

            Here you’re just wrong. Read some court opinions.

            “It is an infringement on the federal/state employees’ free speech”

            Nope, when they are acting as agents of the government, the government can (and does) restrict speech in many ways.

            “The Constitution is very clear on the matter. It is in English and it does not need interpretation.”

            Too bad the courts don’t agree with you.

            “”….nor prohibiting the free exercise of.” This means ANY law passed to prohibit the free exercise of religion.”

            So like I said, GO AHEAD AND CONDUCT PRAYERS IN THE WHITE HOUSE. According to you, that’s legal, right?

            ” It was written in plain English and if you simply READ it without bias, it is very clear.”

            Read what Madison wrote about it. He WROTE the amendment.

          • JW Olson

            1. There is no such thing as government land. It is public land. We allow government to function there.
            2. Again the pledge is not imposed by anyone. Nobody is forced to recite it.
            3. Oh, I missed the part in the First Amendment that said, “…nor prohibiting the free exercise of unless representing the government.” The founders of this country went to great lengths to protect freedom OF religion. That means ANYONE.
            4. Yes, they lost. That does not change the fact that they are attempting to stop freedom of religion.
            5. You and the courts disagree but that does not change the fact that if you read the Constitution and do not try to add interpretation based on bias, there is no restriction against promoting religion….only creating laws which promote religion. It says, “shall pass no laws with regards to the establishment of religion.” It does not say, “shall take no action with regards to the establishment of religion.”

            When you consider the number of actions by the founders…even when president…it is absolutely clear that they did not oppose free expression by public servants.

          • Brian Westley

            I don’t know why you bothered to reply again, it’s the same as below, and my answers are the same.

        • heroay

          This is an ashkenazi (look at his dumb face) programmed troll. NO argument, NO reference, NO reason will sway IT into the real world. His brian brain was mashed since his first time at the talmud. He believes he can win over goys no matter what. Reality will catch with him sooner or later. Neither the Republic nor Christianity will be eradicated from this country. But them subversives will. For the 243rd time in recorded history. So Be IT!

      • proudwhite

        ..so says the Queer …Yea..sure sissy..

        • Brian Westley

          Wow, the idiot white supremacist with homoerotic insults.

          • heroay

            Wow, the ashkenazi homo-tard with brain-dead comments.

        • SpeakTruth

          Oh, it’s you again. The one short on critical thinking and manners, but full of juvenile, low brow insults. Are you 13?

          • Brian Westley

            Ah, like your critical thinking? Oh wait, the only contribution you’ve made in this comment thread is to 1) insult me, and 2) berate me for insulting people.

            BWAHAHAHAHA!

          • chamuiel

            it takes very little to get the truly insane to laughing hysterically.

            You have proven that.

          • heroay

            Watch it, you are splashing the wall.

          • chamuiel

            are you and brian 9?

          • SpeakTruth

            Ummm, no. But thanks for asking.

          • heroay

            10. i knew it immediately. Now, flush yourself.

          • SpeakTruth

            Heroay and Chamuiel, my comments to Proudwhite were not random. I rarely come across adults that when faced with an argument or point they do not understand or agree with, they call someone a “queer” or “sissy”. I confess I am not in the habit of associating with white supremacists, however. Nor do I usually come across Christians jumping to their defense.

          • heroay

            This forum is about (talmudic) attack on Christianity. If a wild an crazy guy down the street, in all sincerity, tosses dung at these anti-Christian bigoted ashkenazi wackos, i WILL side with him, even if he stinks. As for ‘sissy’ and ‘queer’, it is VERY possible Proudwhite already ‘made out’ the robotic parasite ashkenazi troll!!! LOL! Sorry, but you are on the wrong side of the fence to start with!

          • heroay

            No, they are past 30, but their brain mass was retained around 10, to control them and used them as zio-trolls for Zion.

      • Bruno Williams

        BS, 85% of Americans identify as Christian, but the term Merry Christmas has become a anathema to progressive leftist as yourself. Public displays of nativity scenes removed from public places. Stores and business eliminating the phase merry Christmas for Happy Holidays. But I imagine in your little smug and snarky brain these are all just generalities, not specific enough for your taste. In your progressive mind, if you say there is no problem, then it must be true, it’s all made up and we must all believe a little bright penny like yourself. Russia has more public Christmas displays than we do now. But little bright know it all like yourself don’t see a problem with it. I bet you think Obama is a great guy too. Wouldn’t doubt that you voted for him twice.

        • Brian Westley

          “Public displays of nativity scenes removed from public places.”

          From government property, if it isn’t part of an open public forum, yes. Put them on private property. Do you have a problem with private property?

          “Stores and business eliminating the phase merry Christmas for Happy Holidays.”

          Capitalism in action – stores want to sell as much to as many people as possible, and don’t want to alienate non-Christian customers. Do you have a problem with capitalism?

          “But I imagine in your little smug and snarky brain these are all just generalities, not specific enough for your taste.”

          If you could read for comprehension, you’d know that, no, you haven’t referenced specific instances.

          • Well Done

            Your belief about religious displays on public property violates the rights of people who are doing you no harm, and makes it obvious where your mindset is coming from. And where you need to go.

          • Brian Westley

            “Your belief about religious displays on public property violates the rights of people”

            My BELIEFS do that? Wow, I’m more powerful than I thought.

            Whine harder. And continue to ignore my examples of atheists opposing Islam and hypocritically complain that atheists never do that.

          • Bruno Williams

            An action by atheist on christmas is an act of provocation and anti Christian. Small groups pressure and cry offense. from schools to retail stores people don’t like it. Give me an example of an all message of peace by an atheist group on christmas. Can’t do it because people like you disguise your hate under the mask of Fairness. What I don’t understand is why do you take the holidays off? I bet you don’t turn down presents. I bet you were spoiled a child and got your game boys, x boxes and other trendy stuff. Atheist do not believe in kindness or generosity as a virtue. No liberal progressive gives anything away out of generosity there is always strings attached. Christ and the season bring to humanity some and atheist never did and that is hope and kindness. You want to shut out something that reminds you of the ultimate finality and accountability. You’re too young and immature to understand this yet. Your comments are typical of the all knowing pop-culture mind, and you have been brought up in a culture hating something you never understood. But no matter, Christianity and it’s message has been around for 2000 years. It has lasted longer and is more powerful than anything you beleive in.

          • Brian Westley

            “An action by atheist on christmas is an act of provocation and anti Christian.”

            Too bad for you, then.

      • chamuiel

        But, wasn’t the atheists attempting to cover up the German celebration?

        strange how you think one groups rights should not be shared by all groups.

        But, that is just like an atheist liberal.

        I can do it, but you can’t.

        • Brian Westley

          “But, wasn’t the atheists attempting to cover up the German celebration?”

          No, they didn’t cover up someone else’s message.

      • JW Olson

        How is this squashing anyone’s freedom? If they removed the Atheists’ “A” that is removing their freedom. Holding up a banner with a different view is ALSO using their freedom.

      • Tricia Anthone

        I would just love to see them unfurl a banner over the days of Ramadan saying something derisive about Mohammad. Oh, no, they would never denigrate the people or things celebrated as sacred by people who FIGHT BACK. Why? Because they are cowards and bullies who pick only on people with a commitment to peaceful response. Their intellectual dishonesty is really stunning.

        Our Constitution guarantees freedom OF not from religion. There is no requirement to keep religion out of public view.

        The atheists are so threatened by any public expression of faith that they insist religion – particularly the Christian religion – be treated as an obscenity. Meanwhile the overtly obscene (Miley Cyrus twerking “performance”) is given their approval. And the religions whose adherents are committed to VIOLENT response to denigration of their prophet are treated with kid gloves and deference.

        Don’t the blithering idiots in the press corp recognize cowardice and hypocrisy?

        • Brian Westley

          “I would just love to see them unfurl a banner over the days of Ramadan saying something derisive about Mohammad.”

          Is this close enough?
          http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/

      • Tricia Anthone

        Examples? The threat of lawsuit against schools, municipalities and others in order to stomp out Christmas celebrations carols, Christmas trees, etc. The constitution specifically guarantees freedom TO EXPRESS RELIGION – NOT freedom from religion. You have NO RIGHT to expect the State to scrub religious expression from the public square. Yet that is the principle supposition of the “freedom FROM religion” group. It is PURPOSELY dishonest – a purposeful corruption of constitutional principle whose propagation is reliant an ability to manipulate the dullards who are least likely to actually read and understand the 1st Amendment rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

        • Brian Westley

          SPECIFIC examples. Which schools, who threatened lawsuits, etc.

          So many right-wingers can’t seem to read.

      • IHateLibs

        Go suck nuts , a$$wipe

        • Brian Westley

          You exemplify Christians.

      • TexasJester

        Because of the atheists filing lawsuits left n right in Texas, we’ve passed a “Merry Christmas Law”. It basically states that saying “Merry Christmas” in the public square and in public schools — as well as having traditional Christmas scenes and programs — is LEGAL in the Republic of Texas.

        We actually had to pass a state law to protect our God-given, Constitutionally-protected right of Freedom Of Religion First Amendment rights!!

        • Brian Westley

          What you’re describing is pandering to the rubes by passing a redundant law.

      • Independence_R_US

        Brian you should be so proud that this organization stopped that terrible religious practice of donating to the needy this year. They stopped a group from giving toys to poor children. I’m so thankful that you folks stopped the kids from being subjected to the horrors of religion & toys. Maybe you could send all the kids a message telling them that you expect a thank you letter becasue you kept them from being irrevocable harmed.

        • Brian Westley

          Well, they stopped a public school from getting unlawfully involved in proselytizing Christianity.

          • Independence_R_US

            You should be so proud that these children didn’t get any toys. I
            sure hope that makes you feel better. Becasue I’m sure the kids would
            have rather had the toys & maybe a religious tract then to know that
            you’re happy.

            But hey as long as you’re getting your way that’s
            all that matters right? Heaven forbid that someone be told Merry
            Christmas or be helped in time of need.

            You know maybe the folks
            in New Orleans should have told the Baptists men to go home becasue
            they weren’t wanted becasue they were religious.

            If we could
            just bottle all the stupid that comes from you folks & turn it into
            energy this world would be energy independent in seconds.

            Just goes to show folks that stupid can’t be fixed. So how does it feel to be the poster children for intentional stupidity.

          • Brian Westley

            The toys weren’t the problem; using public schools to promote Christianity was the problem. If Franklin Graham’s organization (Samaritan’s Purse) had been willing to distribute the toys without Christian pamphlets, it probably would have been OK — but since proselytizing was the point, that suggestion was a non-starter.

            You can’t misuse public schools to promote your favorite religion.

          • Independence_R_US

            Wow what a cowardly cop out. Typical of folks like yourself. In order to live with your self you have to make lame excuses. So sad.

            Again maybe you & your egotistical & narcissistic haters could have fixed the issues. Yet that wasn’t important. What was important was to get some press & to make others miserable.

            So again you should be so proud that the children weren’t forced to suffer the indignities of having toys. There are special rewards for folks like you.

            You can’t misuse. In other words who cares about anything other than your ignorant & hateful opinions. BTW brain dead these types of things have been going on for decades & not a soul has had an issue until your ilk arrived.

            Again stupid can’t be fixed.

          • Brian Westley

            “Wow what a cowardly cop out.”

            It’s no cop out; that’s the actual problem. Removing the religious propaganda would remove the problem. Atheist organizations are not going to stand by and allow public schools to promote religion.

          • Independence_R_US

            Really!!! You won’t stand for it. Sounds pretty cowardly to me as well as egotistically, arrogant, & self centered. Of course you folks never have a problem decideing what other should do, feel, say, believe, etc.

            A public school wasn’t promoting anything. But as usual the little voices in your head tell you that these bad folks were torturing these children.

            I’m sure the folks in New Orleans had no issues with the Baptist groups showing up to help. Of course you folks would rather they didn’t as it wasn’t you that had to suffer. How typically stupid.

            Again you can’t fix intentional stupidity.

          • Brian Westley

            “Really!!! You won’t stand for it.”

            No. Public schools need to be neutral. They can’t be misused to promote Christianity or any other religion (or atheism for that matter).

            “Sounds pretty cowardly to me as well as egotistically, arrogant, & self centered.”

            To me it sounds like making public schools follow the law.

            “A public school wasn’t promoting anything.”

            The school would have had its students put together toy packages to promote Christianity.

            If you think the law is on your side in this case, go ahead and fund a lawsuit. Atheist groups do that when they think their rights are being infringed.

          • Independence_R_US

            Of course it sounds grand to you. As usual you have it wrong. As the school asked for volunteers. So the school wasn’t using a religious group to promote a religion. But hey as long as you feel vindicated. That goes great with the children that didn’t get any toys. How wonderful it must be to be so egotistically self centered that others are suffering for your so called indignation.

            BTW it’s too late now as the cowards got their way. Of course none of the lame stream media covered it as it doesn’t look good to show kids being put upon by the village idiots.

            Also many folks fold like cheap suits when these morons threaten. I for one would back our schools to call their bluff. But they don’t show their ugly mugs down here as they might get shown the door.

          • Brian Westley

            “As the school asked for volunteers.”

            Public schools can’t ask for volunteers to promote religion, either.

            ‘School leader privately admits ‘indefensible’ breach of church and state’
            http://www.9news.com/news/article/365198/188/School-drops-Operation-Christmas-Child-after-lawsuit-threat

          • Independence_R_US

            Gee Brian you have to have been drop on your head as a child. The school asked for someone to help with a need. In your tiny ignorant brain if the volunteers don’t meet your requirements then the kids don’t get anything. Better to fill the heads of children with sex education & useless fluff than for them to have toys or a pleasant Christmas.

            If I got a nickle for every time I heard that idiotic statement I could have flow the kids to some plush resort; put them up in a 5 star motel for the month. Stupid can’t be fixed. You’re a perfect example.

            The right states that a GOV sanctioned religion can’t be established. So then the RED CROSS can’t help anyone because they’re a religious organization. Not that other can’t worship[ or have religion. Do you know what the word stupid means. I can see not.

            Again you should be so proud that the kids didn’t get any presents. Maybe put that on your resume. I’m sure others would like to celebrate with you.

          • Brian Westley

            “Gee Brian you have to have been drop on your head as a child.”

            I see you’re out of arguments and now down to just mindless insults.

            Did you bother to read what’s at the link? The lawyers at the Alliance Defense Fund (which defends rightwing Christians) even admitted it was indefensible.

      • Well Done

        The article makes two points: childishly stupid people are trying to upstage another group who is doing a nativity scene, and the childishly stupid people NEVER bother anything associated with Islam. Christians are exercising their freedom of speech by pointing out how full of wind atheism is. Atheists oppose Christmas plays in school, oppose gov’t putting up a Christmas tree, to name just two examples. Maybe one day you weenie wankers will get the treatment from Catholics that you know you’ll get from Islamists. That day can’t come too soon.

        • Brian Westley

          “the childishly stupid people NEVER bother anything associated with Islam.”

          Sure they do; you just can’t read. You even complained about atheists not complaining about Islam when the very next reply below was mine, citing these two:

          in 2009 the MN ACLU sued the Tarek ibn Ziyad Academy for holding Muslim prayers and such. The school was shut down in 2011 due to their violations.

          American Atheists have also criticized Islam (and Judaism) as seen here:
          http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2012/03/01/atheist-group-targets-muslims-jews-with-myth-billboards-in-arabic-and-hebrew/

          • heroay

            CNN, run by CIA. Cool, dummy!

      • butterflyinoh

        That started it back in the late 50′s and Madalyn O’Hare was the founder of Atheisim, and if you ever heard her speak, this woman was so full of hate she wanted to reflect it against others….taking prayers and pictures of Jesus out of schools, government not being allowed to display ANY religious symbols on government properties….this was the START of the downfall of America. Now, they’re going after our military and it just keeps getting worse….I don’t care WHO you are…we’re ALL going to stand before God Almighty and answer for everything we’ve done.

        • Brian Westley

          “taking prayers and pictures of Jesus out of schools”

          Out of public schools, yes. Public schools are for everyone, not just Christians. It seems you prefer public schools that are just for Christians.

          By the way, only official and teacher-led prayers were taken out of public schools; students can and always have been able to pray.

          “government not being allowed to display ANY religious symbols on government properties”

          Not quite true, but why should the government do it? Shouldn’t private citizens and groups do that? Do you want the government to tell you what religion you ought to follow?

          • heroay

            Masochist. You like to be trashed around for your corrosive ignorance… Oh-wait! You are a robotized zombie, by the zionist mafia! Shame is a non-existing word in your digital dictionary.

        • SpeakTruth

          Oh, to be sure. Taking religion out of public schools, asking that we not be forced to pray, is truly unthinkable. I suppose if your children were made to pray to Allah or Zeus, or Satan, you would be ok with that? That is the problem with many religious people. They have no ability to consider how it feels for anyone but themselves,

      • reinhold

        Get in our face. Expect consequences. Atheist have not part in the celebration of the Christmas holiday. Now you can expect that we will appear wherever you push you nose. Stand Down or Fall where you stand.

      • Joe Swartz

        Buy attending a Christmas event stupid.

        • Brian Westley

          Assuming you meant “by”, no, attending a Christmas event does not squash anyone’s freedom of religion.

      • Billy Bumtrip

        Stop Whining

      • heroay

        install wiper blades on your round frontal windows, then you will see. The MUD from the low road you have trolled all your miserable life, has obstructed your vision to the real world. Loser.

      • Karen Lee King

        I can answer for butterflyinoh and say that we Christians use to be able to pray in Jesus’ name in public, but now we can’t or else we could get arrested, We can no longer teach the Bible in the schools, We can no longer even have the Bible present in the classrooms, We can no longer hang gospel pictures with out offending the Atheists. And if we do, then there is the risk of the atheists wanting to sue us. There is the examples you wanted.

        • heroay

          Blame no one but the hypocrite talmudic trash. In the times of the Christ these were the peddlers of the Mishna, the pharsical pharisees. Today, it’s the rabid rabbinos, especially in tel aviv, who train these half-animals to hate Christians and help destroy Christianity.

          But don’t even try to reverse the indoctrination of that brainless troll before you. It’s like trying to civilize a Neanderthal, right out of the cave. Literally.

        • Brian Westley

          “I can answer for butterflyinoh and say that we Christians use to be able to pray in Jesus’ name in public, but now we can’t or else we could get arrested,”

          That’s a lie.

          “We can no longer teach the Bible in the schools”

          Of COURSE not. Not everyone in a public school is a Christian. Duh.

          “We can no longer even have the Bible present in the classrooms”

          Your kids can. Other people’s kids can have their own books, too. Koran, Torah, The god Delusion, etc.

          “We can no longer hang gospel pictures with out offending the Atheists.”

          Where? You can’t hang them in public schools, of course, because I already explained that not everyone belongs to your favorite religion, duh. You can certainly hang them in your own home.

          “And if we do, then there is the risk of the atheists wanting to sue us.”

          Where would you be hanging these pictures?

          ” There is the examples you wanted.”

          No, as I have to keep explaining to people of very little brain, I want examples of actual events. Actual events have a time, place, and real people’s names.

      • debalazo

        The ONLY creeps squashing freedom here and ANYWHERE in the world, are the parasite rapine vandal ashkenazi talmudic filth. And for 2000 years, if we include their cousins in Palestine. Hypocrite lying mouth. WE have read your trash called the talmud, your criminal plan called the Protocols to destroy the United States. And have witnessed ALL your crimes through the last century upon ALL of humanity. Only an animal would have no shame to post idiocy like you. Karma IS a B*tch, and you WILL experience it.

    • lovinspoonful

      Right back atcha, atheists. Don’t like it when it is turned on you, do you?

    • IHateLibs

      Put them ALL on the Front Line . Then lets see just HOW FAST or IF they change their tune !!!

      • RedGod

        Funny, I was on the front lines. Didn’t see Jesus anywhere.

        • heroay

          BECAUSE, the Christ is NOT a mercenary for the ashkenazi banksters, the zionist dual-passport traitors in the D.C. Latrine, nor the infiltrators in the Pentagon. Nor a patsy for israHell, enemy number ONE. Smedley Butler, USMC, “War is a Racket.” Duh?

          • RedGod

            Right. That makes sense.

    • debalazo

      b, there is another minority hiding on that more visible minority, causing all these problems, here, and worldwide. The talmudic ashkenazi zionists, working behind every opportunity available to them, to create division and war, to only benefit their criminal instincts. Read “The Talmud Unmasked – Pranaitis”, cited on this thread, below. And their Protocols. And KNOW from their deceiving, lying mouths, how they will (pretend) conquer and destroy the United States and Christianity, the LAST obstacles to impose their planned Jew World Order. Then, spit on them.

    • Debora Ann Binegar Howk

      Ok

    • Mr Keith Charles Johnson

      What I don’t understand is how in the name of all that’s holy can they be against someone that they claim doesn’t exist?

    • heterodox

      But which god? And how do you know?

      The only judgment (note the spelling of that word, BTW) I ever see is that of people like you. The only threats I see are from people like you. The only hard sell on horrific ideology is from people like you.

      So far, “god” has been completely mute.

  • Rob

    A before they put the Angel sign in front the A stood for A_s Hol_es.

  • morgus

    Odd atheists never protest anything Muslim, atheists have said Muslims have no religious symbols so atheists are not offended, yet on top of the WTC is a minaret. Atheists are nothing but a bunch of pussies attacking non combatant Christians, they’re cowards when it comes to Muslims.

    • Brian Westley

      “Odd atheists never protest anything Muslim”

      Wrong, but thanks for playing:
      http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2012/03/01/atheist-group-targets-muslims-jews-with-myth-billboards-in-arabic-and-hebrew/

      “atheists have said Muslims have no religious symbols so atheists are not offended, yet on top of the WTC is a minaret”

      What color is the sky in your world?

      • chamuiel

        the muslim dom (Minaret) is not a religious symbol to the muslims?

        Now, you can add lying to your many non accomplishments

        • Brian Westley

          “the muslim dom (Minaret) is not a religious symbol to the muslims?”

          I didn’t say that. I was referring to your disconnect with reality.

    • Charlie McKenna

      Well it’s just an idea but perhaps they don’t target Muslims is that Muslims don’t try to put their religious symbols on gov’t. property. All atheists want people to do is obey the law and not put religious symbols on gov’t property. You can put them up at your church or on your property in your business ANYWHERE BUT GOV’T. PROPERTY why is that so hard for you to understand.

      • lovinspoonful

        OH, we need your permissions now do we? since when? And wh odo you think you are? What makes you think your rights come before anyone else’s? Interesting, none of this bothered the atheists until this year. Odd, isn’t I t?

        • Brian Westley

          “OH, we need your permissions now do we? since when?”

          To put religious symbols on government property? Since always.

          “What makes you think your rights come before anyone else’s?”

          He’s only saying that everyone has to play by the same rules. How are his rights coming before anyone else’s?

          “Interesting, none of this bothered the atheists until this year.”

          What are you talking about? Atheists have had to fight for their right to equal treatment for years. You just haven’t noticed until now.

          • chamuiel

            “Atheists have had to fight for their right to equal treatment for years.”

            That statement makes no sense. atheists have always had the right to believe or disbelieve, same as everyone else.

            Where do you come up with these lies you insist upon posting.

            No one forces you to go to church. No one has ever forced you to believe.

            What you are actually saying is atheists like gays do not want equality, they want to be superior and force their non beliefs down every one else’s throats (pun intended.).

          • Brian Westley

            “That statement makes no sense. atheists have always had the right to believe or disbelieve, same as everyone else.”

            But it often takes court action to get people, particularly government officials, to actually follow the law.

            “Where do you come up with these lies you insist upon posting.”

            These aren’t lies.

        • William T. Robbins

          Government property is not Christian. It’s that simple. If it is a public forum everyone gets to speak. How about we let you have a whole bunch of tax free land to put all the symbols you want on? Oh wait you already have that.

          • heroay

            Dumb Robbie, this is Christian country, not talmudic or anything else. And since majority of Christians WORK, unlike leftards who don’t, and since the US was built by mostly Christians, but since 1913 usurped by zionist commie ashkenazi bolsheviks, the Republic will be restored, and the pariahs made to pay their dues for rapine and treason.

      • djasp

        the “A” is the new cross.. ha ha, hypocrites.. really. atheists are never honest and thats what bugs me. they don’t want religious symbols on govt property but they’ll display an A with a religious message (yes atheism is a religion).. they’ll waste money on banners and billboards “to get their message out” then rail on christians for spending money on churches to “get their message out”.. they make fun of religion, then they gather in a building once a week. Why can’t atheists just admit they’re trying to rile people up and get them angry, because anger makes people think. it always has.. anger is a tool to stir thought and conversation. Athiests are posting these signs to coincide with christmas etc because their intent is to instigate christians into thinking differently. who else is the sign for? this nonsense about “we want other atheists to know its okay to come out of the closet” is pure nonsense, and they know it..

      • lacourt

        I agree with you totally, Charlie. I don’t think Christians will be satisfied until the United states becomes a theocracy.
        For example, our pledge of allegience used to read “one nation indivisible”. Now it reads, “one nation under God” And our money includes the words “in God we trust”.
        I’m sure there are many “reasonable” Christians that fully understand that the separation of church and state is in their best interest, but they are not the ones who are whining that there is somehow a war on Christmas.
        Happy Solstice.
        Marilyn

        • heroay

          happy channukkah, olde troll.

      • heroay

        “Government property”??? WE the PEOPLE OWN the government, dumb troll… WE hire SERVANT representatives, wacko… WE feed every scum in the DC Latrine… The government is an administrator, NOT owner of the land. The government does not produce, only TAKES away… Your failed training in a latrine in tel aviv reflects in all your dumb posts. Payback is around the corner, for all the zionist mafia who hijacked this country in 1913. And you will have to WORK for feed, once the 3.6 billion dollar theft is cut off from your pariah garrison in the M.E.

  • Shirley Nanos

    Okay, we have to be fair. The Constitution gives everyone freedom to express their religion. The atheists have a right to not believe. They have a right to post billboards etc. as long as they do not destroy other religions billboards etc. They can yell at the tops of their lungs that they do not support religion but they cannot stop you from yelling at the tops of your lungs that you do. Then to cover their banners is as wrong as it is for them tocover yours. That is the Constitution. Christians have just been made to entirely lose their right to religious freedom. That is not Constitutional and I believe we are willing now to begin expressing it again. To sing Christmas Carols in School is not against the Constitution. There is no mention of separation of church and state in the Constitution.You need to back it up with the clause that says so, not just intimate it is there. The same with Muslim, if they are American they have the same right, if not they do not. However, Muslims feel that they have the ONLY religion and we will not be stifled by them either. If they don’t like it let them go home.

    • Brian Westley

      “Christians have just been made to entirely lose their right to religious freedom.”

      I was with you until this sentence.

      “There is no mention of separation of church and state in the Constitution. You need to back it up with the clause that says so, not just intimate it is there.”

      You need to read court opinions, like Reynolds v. U.S (1878), Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Engel v. Vitale (1962).

      Lots of phrases are not found in the constitution, like right to a fair trial and separation of powers. It’s shorthand for what the constitution means.

      • allah_speaking

        Getting dicey on splitting hairs aren’t we?
        First Amendment to the Constitution (Bill of Rights)

        Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof

        >Freedom From Religion Foundation

        LOL!

        • heroay

          This crank is a robotic fractal brian brain zombie at the service of his zionist talmudic deceiving puppetmasters. THEY are the wans behind ‘atheists’ attacking Christianity. Deceiving subversive enemies of America. Flush them!

      • heroay

        yak-yak…. your oil is LOW, and your DIAPER is FULL… buzz off, stinky!

    • chamuiel

      This whole thing started because the atheists covered up the German groups display. Why don’t you tell them not to do that.

      that would be fair.

      • Brian Westley

        “This whole thing started because the atheists covered up the German groups display.”

        This article doesn’t say that.

        • auntielib

          The article also doesn’t say Hitler was an Atheist.
          But he was.
          So what’s your point, Brian??

          • Brian Westley

            My point is that atheists did not cover up the German display. Also look up “Gott mit uns”

          • SpeakTruth

            Auntie, Hitler claimed to be a Christian, at any rate.

          • heroay

            He WAS.

          • heroay

            Yes, Hitler WAS a Christian. But History is written, and messed with, by the victors. And WHO won? The ‘West’? NO, the ashkenazi overlords of the meager bunch of talmudics in the world (0.23% of world pops, ruling it by deceit and treachery), the RAT-a-child (sewer RATS from Shinar), the ones who fabricated israHell, installed the FED Rapine and Rapine Tax in the US, and was ready to blow the world to SAVE themselves from retaliation and punishment, WW3, sizzled by President Putin. As Predicted 2000 years ago (Magog vs and evil squat garrison in Palestine).

            Masters of FAILED Deceit, thanks to the Internet.

        • heroay

          Replace your windshield blades, dummy. You only read to your convenience, and that of your talmudic ashkenazi puppet masters. Clank-clank… need OIL!

    • SpeakTruth

      Ma’am, all religions claim to be the only “true” religion. That is the irony. If your child were made to pray to Allah at school a few times a day, you would protest as well. Atheists feel that way about all religions. If your legislators came to session with prayer rugs, you might protest. If on the grounds of your state Capitol there was a statue of a pentagram, you might protest. You get the point. Having said that, there are rude people everywhere. The National Organization of Women fights for women’s rights, but I disagree with some things they do, and I am a woman. I agree with the mission of Atheists groups, but I disagree with some things they do. Most of us would just like to be treated with courtesy and respect. I would hope you do not agree with the actions of Westboro Baptist Church (protesting at veterans’ funerals), even though you are members of the same religion. Maybe if we all quit looking for injustices and just stopped and considered how we would feel in that position, we would have less animosity.

      • heroay

        IF you are really, really a WOMAN, even if a LESBIAN, i apologize for any male insults i may have given you, even if deserved. i don’t take anti-Christian talmudic beasts lightly. To Gehenna with them. (Humm… no wonder you sounded ‘gay’…typing, that is…) *(^ ^)/*

        BUT, WBC is doing the right thing, SIMPLY because ALL WARS since the Revolution, were instigated, started, and financed, to these days, by these demonic talmudic animals, using the fake economical fiat money power of their earthly overlords, the RAT-a-childs in London.

        And the armed forces of ALL countries therefore, are serving the devil’s cause of the ashkenazi rapine vandals, the bankster maggots in every central bank in the world. War for Profit. Especially, the FED in the USA.

        And to make it ‘short’, this is a CHRISTIAN country, founded on CHRISTIAN PRINCIPLES, NOT churchian (Catholic), and NOT anything ELSE, much, much, much LESS, talmudic genocidal, anti-Christian dung. The time to STOP them, is NOW.

    • heroay

      Before we get involved with Muslims, remember the ashkenazi Brits INVENTED Wahhabism, Radical Islam, to destroy Islam, and then terrorize Christianity, and destroy it also. The talmudic fiends. The rabbinical wackos. They are behind all wars, all ‘radical’ factions of EVERY conflict in the world, because they, the RAT-a-child beasts at The City in London, fabricate the ‘money’ of just about every country in the world, at GUN POINT. Try, the FED?

      So, let’s KICK OUT all the talmudic subversives, dual-passport traitors, Letter Soup Agency bosses, and restore Liberty and Sanity in this country, and we, and the world, won’t have any more conflicts, as they won’t be accepted as quasi-gods riding on our shoulders for free.

  • http://twitter.com/#!/KniteOwls Knite Owls

    So the open and free debate that these Christians are bring this “A,” in turn is getting the atheist message out there. And some how this is “suppression” of speech?
    Nope! Stating that speech is protected by freedom of thought and can’t be questioned is inane.

    • Brian Westley

      No, covering up the atheists’ sign is suppression of speech. As you point out, the end effect actually gets the atheists’ message out more, but that wasn’t the intention of the badly-behaved Christians.

      “Stating that speech is protected by freedom of thought and can’t be questioned is inane.”

      Who has said that? Are you replying to imaginary statements?

      • chamuiel

        No, the atheists covering up the German display was suppression of speech.

        You keep leaving that out.

        It is o.k., according to you for atheists to suppress others speech, but it is not o.k. for others to suppress atheists speech.

        really?

        • Brian Westley

          “Upstage” does not mean they covered it up.

          • heroay

            clank-clank… you need more oil, retard robot.

        • heroay

          brian brain-less is a zombie for zion. You cannot re-program IT. Only the zio-tards have the key for IT.

  • Judy Fine

    It doesn’t bother my Christian beliefs if Athiests don’t believe. I’m comfortable enough in how I feel about what Christmas means to me & frankly don’t “get it” as to what Athiests are afraid of. I mean what harm can be done to you anyway since you choose not to believe? Mortal humans aren’t your enemy, we can’t judge you. I say let us have our rights & you go have yours. It’s still a free country. Whatever is offensive to you, just stay away, look the other way..go home & smoke a joint & chill out if that’s what makes you feel better.

    • William T. Robbins

      I love your attitude. It is simple. The government permits all or permits none. No one is challenging churches or other private property.

    • djasp

      yeah, i never understood it. i worked with an athiest (a real atheist) and he could care less. the only time he kicked up a fuss was if someone incessantly bullied him about religion, which only happened once. he basically had nothing in common with religion and just went about his way. once he told me that “I’m free from the chains of religion and I’m not going to waste another second of my life on it” and he didn’t.. he didn’t protest christmas or talk about why he DIDNT believe in god.. he didn’t want to talk about god period.. in fact he liked religion because he thought it kept a lot of “unstable people at peace” (which i don’t agree with but it was an interesting take-an atheist LIKING religion) to me thats a real atheist. So WHY are these atheists wasting time and money to argue their case ALL OVER christmas displays, flying banners, etc. it doesnt make a lick of sense other than to seem to be trying to instigate fights… its really bizarre

      • heroay

        You are absolutely right. Atheists just walk life. But the talmudic bigots (“The Talmud Unmasked – Pranaitis) are the ones bent over and backwards (and bobbing heads…) trying like maniacs to destroy Christianity, for 2000 years.

        And, rightfully labeled MASTERS OF DECEIT (until the Internet X-Posed them) are the ones using all shades of colors as disguise, who are instigating hate and warring between East and West, Catholic vs Protestant, White vs Black, Communism vs Capitalism, Christianity vs Islam, Democrats vs Republicans, Obongo vs Ron Paul, on and on, ad nauseam!

        Shine the Light of Truth into it’s Crypt, and the Devil will sink deep into Hell.

  • Muslim Comments

    A is also for Allah

    • allah_speaking

      You rang?

      • it’sthatbad

        ROTFLMAO.

        • patriciamlewis

          yuk-yuk.

          • it’sthatbad

            Gotta Laugh can’t cry all the time. O’Dumbo has made our life hell, might as well find humor some place…….

  • John S

    What’s funny about this is that Christmas is a holiday to celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ. Now, those atheists who try their best to eliminate religion still seem to want to celebrate the holiday, but call it something different. I think that, subconsciously, they are all “in the closet” Christians. Fools!

    • heroay

      in the closet ‘talmudists’. Get to learn their surnames. The ONLY ONES who hate Christianity. Under many covers, tags, and titles.

  • George

    As a Christian, i may be wrong sometimes, because i know i am fallible,..but atheists don’t seem to have the humility to realize that they are also fallible, and could also be wrong.
    If i’m wrong, and there is no God, no skin off anyone’s nose, including my own.
    If the atheists are wrong, what then?
    (WARNING: Every atheist i have ever met says they are not wrong, can’t be wrong, and many of them will TRY to punctuate their statement by saying things like “i’m not wrong,..God doesn’t exist,..FACT”).
    Let them continue to think that they can’t be wrong.
    That says a whole lot more about them, than it does about any Christian that says they believe.
    If the atheists are wrong, there’s hell to pay,..quite literally.

    That is also no skin off my nose.
    It’s called freewill, and i didn’t make that choice for the atheist(s).
    They chose, all by themselves.

    • dave_aka_lambsev

      Kudos George! Well said!
      Revelation 22
      11 He that is unrighteous, let him do unrighteousness still: and he that is filthy, let him be made filthy still: and he that is righteous, let him do righteousness still: and he that is holy, let him be made holy still.

      I will say that it all makes me fear and tremble…

    • SpeakTruth

      George, I am an atheist, and I agree with you. I may, indeed, be wrong. I don’t think so, but it is impossible to prove a negative, so we are all left with making a “guess” based on life experiences, education, feelings (for lack of a better word), etc. My conclusion is different than yours, but, like you said, either one of us could be wrong. My “atheism” is less about there not being an omnipotent being (although I still don’t think so) but mostly about the man made religions and the followers that like to tell us what their holy books say and mean, as if one person can interpret the words better than another person (given a similar ability to read and comprehend.) Even among Christians there is wide disagreement on what the Bible says and means. Anyway, my experience has been that is easy to label groups as mean, hateful, judgmental, etc. but when I took the time to get to know the individual, they are mostly like me with the same hopes, needs, etc.
      Take care. :)

      • Dave Burrier

        You sound more like an Agnostic. I am Atheist, true blue and devout. I know without a shadow of doubt that a god cannot exist. I know exactly where I am going when I die and I am happy knowing that. Perhaps I have had more time in retirement to read, think, reason, examine and listen to others. I am a member of FFRF.org and a good book to read is “Losing Faith in Faith” by Dan Barker who is co-president.

        • SpeakTruth

          Thanks, Dave. I guess in the strictest sense, I am an agnostic as I do leave just a teeny bit of uncertainty. But, I am 99.9% sure, there is nothing. I, too, am fine with it. Life is grand and knowing this is all we have makes me cherish it even more. I will absolutely read the book you recommended, as I have read many others of a similar topic. Letter to a Christian Nation by Sam Harris is my favorite, and Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens participated in some fantastic debates that can be viewed on YouTube. Thank you for being a member of FFRF.org and for reaching out to me.

          • heroay

            Especially for ATHEISTS; and religious people in general, and Christians nonetheless. Plug their mouths, fellas! Google.

            “Does God Exist?” – video
            “Is God a Mathematician?”
            “Life’s Ultimate Question – Does God Exist?”
            “The Fine Tuning of the Universe”

            ONLY, a Neanderthal won’t get it.

        • heroay

          names, get the names…. why always the anti-Christians ‘happen’ to be the ‘chosen’ (by themselves) so-called ‘jews’? Coincidence or Conspiracy?

      • heroay

        Google.

        “Does God Exist?” – video
        “Is God a Mathematician?”
        “Life’s Ultimate Question – Does God Exist?”
        “The Fine Tuning of the Universe”

        And that is SCIENCE, not religion.

        ONLY, a Neanderthal won’t get it.

    • heroay

      The truth is, we all are at the level of psychic (‘spiritual’ is a Roman misnomer) evolution that corresponds to each of us. By our OWN making (Free Will). And atheists are Skeptics, in the Kindergarten of Life, learning their way up the ladder. But that’s not the bad part. The bad is, passing for ‘atheists’, the subversive neanderthal ashkenazis falsely called ‘jews’ (an invention of the 13th c. AD), practicing talmudists, are the ones and ONLY ONES, who are trying to destroy Christianity since its inception. Failed, since the Internet X-Posed their treachery and HATE. READ, “The Talmud Unmasked” – Pranaitis. And dump’em.

  • dave_aka_lambsev

    Revelation 1

    8 I am the Alpha and the Omega, saith the Lord God, who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty.

    in context:

    1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show unto his servants, even the things which must shortly come to pass: and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John;

    2 who bare witness of the word of God, and of the testimony of Jesus Christ, even of all things that he saw.

    3 Blessed is he that readeth, and they that hear the words of the prophecy, and keep the things that are written therein: for the time is at hand.

    4 John to the seven churches that are in Asia: Grace to you and peace, from him who is and who was and who is to come; and from the seven Spirits that are before his throne;

    5 and from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, the firstborn of the dead, and the ruler of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loveth us, and loosed us from our sins by his blood;

    6 and he made us to be a kingdom, to be priests unto his God and Father; to him be the glory and the dominion for ever and ever. Amen.

    7 Behold, he cometh with the clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they that pierced him; and all the tribes of the earth shall mourn over him. Even so, Amen.

    8 I am the Alpha and the Omega, saith the Lord God, who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty.