Photo credit ecns.cn
Troubles brewing in the Asian Pacific are making the concept of isolationism sound very attractive.
Relations between China and Japan have never been all that great. We’ve seen two Sino-Japanese wars, with the second lasting more than eight years.
At the close of America’s war with Japan, that country agreed to never take up arms again and even included it in its constitution:
ARTICLE 9. Aspiring sincerely to an international peace based on justice and order, the Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as means of settling international disputes.
(2) To accomplish the aim of the preceding paragraph, land, sea, and air forces, as well as other war potential, will never be maintained. The right of belligerency of the state will not be recognized.
Today, Japan may be re-thinking that provision.
During the last five months, tempers have flared between the two nations over ownership of a small string of islands situated in the East China Sea. Online MBA reports:
The argument came to a head last September, when a boycott of Japanese products led Chinese demonstrators to target fellow citizens who owned Japanese cars. Three months later, the situation escalated when Japanese jets confronted a Chinese plane flying over the islands; no shots were fired, but the act of antagonism has set a troubling precedent between the military forces of both nations.
All of which puts the United States smack dab in the middle.
Since the end of World War II, the United States and Japan have enjoyed a special relationship, including a treaty in which each nation agreed to come to the aid of the other in times of war. Moreover, in November, the United States officially recognized Japan’s claim to the islands. When you throw in China’s repeated patent infringements and reports of cyber-security violations, one would think that would seal the deal for Japan.
But consider this: China holds a substantial portion of America’s $16.4 trillion debt. If it were to suddenly flood the market with U.S. bonds, it could substantially lower the value of U.S. securities and the dollar. Also, many U.S. firms have their products manufactured in China, most notably some General Motors automobiles and all Apple iPhones. Many more, including Jeep, are making plans to do the same.
Conflict between the two nations, which represent the area’s largest economies, would have an enormous economic impact on not just America, but the entire world.
Check out the riveting video below.
Featured posts:
‘No whites allowed’ tutoring policy rocks Colo. school
US pays high price for Obama’s cheap talk
Rubio calls leaked Obama immigration plan ‘dead on arrival’
DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW
Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!
- ‘Act like a grownup’: Drunk driver sobs when she loses plea deal by coming 4 hours late to court - July 23, 2017
- ‘I would’ve fired her the day I met her’: Glenn Beck reveals more about Tomi Lahren mess - July 23, 2017
- Canadian thug beats 74-year-old cyclist bloody with a club in road rage fit– and they say US is more violent? - July 23, 2017
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
BPR INSIDER COMMENTS
Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!
